BY WHO’S AUTHORITY?

There have been many questions asked over and over again regarding the Restored American government, but the most oft posed is; “by who’s authority” is this being done? It is stated that it can’t be we the people because the entire population has not voted on it. It is even being said that it is unlawful or in opposition to the corporation, that it is somehow a declaration of hostility toward them.  Let’s look at the facts, and you can be the judge….

To understand what gives “we the people” the authority to restart our nation we must understand the basis of what we are trying to restore.  Our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution are documents based on Natural Law as it was perceived by our founders.

The founders, recognizing the dangers of “Ruler’s Law” and its inherent oppression were drawn to the concept of “People’s Law” such as that practiced by Anglo-Saxon Common Law under which all decisions and selection of leaders had to be by the consent of the people. Common Law was rooted in the principle of Natural Law endowed by divine dispensation. (Endowed by their Creator).  Among their favorite authors on this subject was Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman philosopher and lawyer who wrote extensively on the simplicity of the only true law needed to govern humanity, that being Natural Law which stated simply is the concept of the “Golden Rule”. Eventually he was assassinated for his views and influence. Remember Rome was a Democracy and as such, dedicated to mob rule not individual sovereignty.

Natural law covers every conceivable crime or violation which man can dream up and commit however it does not recognize that there can be a crime without a victim. Therefore if there is no harm done there can be no violation of Natural Law and there can also be no law or regulation devised by man which will over ride Natural Law.  This is the basis of the Biblical natural law philosophy under which our founders created this nation.

This basis and philosophy remained the standard for the nation until the federal government began feeling too limited by the constitution in their effort to expand their powers and ultimately their control over the people. In order to do that the judicial branch of government had to be changed; the judges had to be made to view our Natural Law as wrong headed or in the words of the progressives, out dated and contrary to social structure.

Enter, Relativism or as it is sometimes called Positivism. It’s important to point out here that “ism’s” are not possible in Natural Law as they are purely concocted by the minds of men and constitute ideology not law ie; Communism, Collectivism, Socialism, Fascism, Nationalism etc.

Relativism holds that there is no right or wrong in society, just different opinions on what is acceptable. For instance; Cannibalism, incest, honor killing and other practices considered abhorrent in our culture are just various kinds of behavior, to be appreciated in some cultures and not in others so suspension of judgment on what is right or wrong becomes the norm.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the danger in this thinking.  According to law professor and scholar John Eidsmoe, this philosophy holds that there are no God-given standards of law, God is not the author of law and therefore man must be, since man evolves then so must law, and that the study of law, the very nature of law is consequently based solely on the decisions of judges.  It would be prudent at this juncture in the conversation to ask, who died and appointed the judges God?

This ideological twisting of the founders philosophy started way back in the 1870’s (probably no coincidence that Organic Act of 1871 occurred in the same time period or that the Trading with the Enemies Act of 1933, which defined all citizens as enemy combatants under the unlawful federal system known as the United States followed.), when Harvard Law School Dean Christopher Columbus Langdell applied Darwin’s theory of evolution to jurisprudence.  From that point on our university students began being taught the idea that the judicial branch of government would make and determine law by reason of their own decisions and for all intents and purposes, rendered our Congress irrelevant.  Is it just me or does that smack of the Fox guarding the Hen House? It’s obvious the people were no longer guarding the Fox. So what do you think a Fox will do if you leave the door to the Hen House wide open, chain each chicken to their nests with tiny iron chicken foot shackles and turn your back for the next hundred years?

As a result of our own negligence in policing the Fox we are now a nation under the direct rule of an unlawful corporation made legitimate by an equally unlawful judiciary branch of government which does not recognize or accept any concept of right and wrong. There is certainly God in our nation but the current God in government is the God of Expediency and Political Agenda. If a man attempts to high jack a plane in this country he will go directly to jail without his two hundred dollars, yet a handful of lunatic ideologues high jack our whole nation and we let them do it.

According to The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776……….

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Yet here we are in the year of our Lord 2010, asking the ridiculous question, “by who’s authority” shall we restore our nation, seat an interim government until we can hold national elections and pick up the shattered pieces left by a literal handful of corrupt and greedy men.

This interim government is being elected by the people. In each state there sits a Grand Jury made up of 23 jurors and 4 alternates. These Grand Juries are appointing by vote the individuals from those states to serve in a temporary capacity until a national election can be organized. The Declaration of Independence does not tell us to pussy foot around until we can educate all the people and get them to stand. On the contrary, it clearly tells us what we must do to restore the nation, not how many will have to wake up in order to do it.

Every person in this country has the opportunity to go to the Restored America site….  http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org/  and become a part of the process. This is still a free country and as such none of the people have the right to force others to wake up and smell the roses let alone to prune them. All people have a clear and present opportunity and the right to choose between liberty and freedom with the Republic or certain collapse with the de facto. We cannot and do not have the slightest wish to make anybody’s decision for them. If you doubt the authority of the Grand Juries to restore this nation, perhaps a decision from a Supreme Court Judge of the very de facto system you are serving will explain it better than I can…………….

In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government "governed" and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.

Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present "True Bills" of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a "buffer" the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law. 

It is imperative that each of us understand that while our Declaration of Independence instructs us to throw off the yoke of bondage and tyranny it does not tell us to raise our hands in combat. The Declaration instructs us to do this in a lawful, peaceful way.  It is of the UTMOST IMPORTANCE that no man or woman of the Republic should resort to violent or forceful measures.  Render to Caesar that which is Caesar’s but leave FORCE TO GOD!

In conclusion, ”We The People” do indeed have the authority to do as we are doing. If you choose to exclude yourself from the people then don’t presume you have the right to complain.  If you don’t like the way it’s being done and you feel it still must be, then by all means come up with a better plan but heed my words here………….. You have very little time to do it because as I have said before, this nation is going to hell on a roller coaster not in a hand basket so you’d better hurry up.  In the meantime everyone has the opportunity to get off that roller coaster before it flies off the busted track by signing their name………… 

TO BE A PATRIOT REQUIRES A STAND, SUNSHINE PATRIOTS ARE THOSE WHO SIT WHEN PUSH COMES TO SHOVE

TLGA