Millions of Americans are asking themselves why the current administration seems to be acting outside the law and definitely outside constitutional authority in blatant, arrogant and even aggressive ways which are causing a massive upheaval in the public consciousness. Everything from an unconstitutional Health Care bill to filing multiple law suits against a state which attempts to protect its citizens from invasion using the clear and present rights given them under the Constitution when the federal government refuses to enforce national immigration law and secure the borders. The Obama administration has even hauled Arizona before the United Nations “Human Rights Council” for its overwhelmingly popular immigration law. Since when does a U.S. president go running to the U.N. because he can’t MAKE THOSE PEOPLE BEHAVE AND DO WHAT HE WANTS? If it wasn’t such an obvious threat to America it would at best be extremely embarrassing to have a president acting like a spoiled child who cannot get his way. Some have said that it’s a blessing in disguise that Obama is our president as he has single handedly awakened the masses to the corruption and true agenda going on in our federal government. Why would he do that?
The answer to that question is in an old magician’s trick, sleight of hand. What is the left hand doing while everybody is watching the right hand? What could be going on which is so insidious that the public needs to be outraged, and engaged to the point their attention is completely diverted?
Is it the secret Cap and Trade measure being put into place behind our backs based on false science and a global scam? Could it be the sneaky move to control ammunition as a way to disarm America? Maybe it’s the concerted effort being made to enforce the U.N.’s Codex Alimentarious and Nutricide ? Or maybe, it’s all that and a whole lot worse.
In my last article BY WHO’S AUTHORITY, I explained how Judicial Positivism or Relativism has been used to corrupt our Supreme Court and Judicial branch of government. It has allowed the judges to find according to their prior opinions or any other criteria they choose to use other than the Constitution. It should be no surprise then when we see federal justices citing foreign law to justify outrageous decisions. Keep in mind that we the people have had no say in who these federal judges seated for life are.
When asked of a true Patriot who takes a stand to save this nation, why he or she feels the nation must be saved in the first place, most will say they are not thinking of themselves but their children and grand children. What parent in the United States of America does not want a better future for their children than their own?
To that end more and more parents in this country are choosing to home school their children when faced with a corrupt educational system designed to indoctrinate rather than educate. This of course places a major hindrance to the “dummy down America plan” when more and more parents are opting to home school each year. What then, can the federal government who are simply a front for the Global Agenda do to stop this massive migration away from the government controlled public school system?
Enter the U.N.; The United Nation's Convention on the Rights of the Child creates specific civil, economic, social, cultural and even economic rights for every child and states that "the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration." While the treaty states that parents or legal guardians "have primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child," experts say the government ultimately would decide if parents' decisions are good, and, therefore, to be followed
HSDLA (Home School Legal Defense Association) previously has warned that the U.N. effort, which has not been adopted by the U.S. but has been embraced by most other nations, "opens the door for judges to make sweeping determinations about how children are educated."
This treaty was signed by President Clinton in 1995 however it requires a two thirds vote by the U.S Senate to ratify it. American parents are indeed fortunate that our Senate, at least at that time had more sense than our president.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., is urging a hurry-up timetable for adoption of a United Nations treaty she says provides for "basic human rights" for children but opponents argue would destroy parental rights to raise their children as they choose.
What exactly does this treaty accomplish? Here are a few examples:
Schools in one region of Scotland are lifting the Internet filters on their school computers so students will be able to access sexually explicit websites if they choose, according to a new report from the Christian Institute.
The institute's report today said the move will impact thousands of children in the National Health Service's Lanarkshire health board area who are being given access to the health board's sexual health Web pages from school computers.
The website, among other things, includes graphic descriptions of "unconventional sex acts" and discusses how sexually transmitted infections are "as common as the cold," according to the report.
Salzkotten, Germany, is sending the fathers of the children to jail for terms of one week because they have refused to turn their children over to school officials for mandated sex classes.
The students who are being held out of sex-education classes also are not being allowed by their parents to participate in a playacting program called "My Body Belongs to Me," which essentially teaches children how to engage in sex, the report said.
The HSLDA reported four families in Mahalapye, Botswana, are facing an uncertain future that may be determined as early as a Sept. 9 court hearing they are being required to attend.
The only reason the four families are facing this situation is because a Botswana judge is using the [United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the CRC] to impose his subjective view regarding education and to substitute his opinion as to what is in the 'best interests' of these children over the views of the parents," the organization explained in a report on its website.
Thirty-one U.S. senators already have signed on to a plan to oppose the convention, and only three more are needed to prevent its adoption. Among other provisions of the treaty, according to the Parental Rights website:
- Parents no longer would be able to administer reasonable spankings to their children.
- A murderer aged 17 years, 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime no longer could be sentenced to life in prison.
- Children would have the ability to choose their own religion while parents would only have the authority to give their children advice about religion.
- The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent's decision.
- A child's "right to be heard" would allow him (or her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which the child disagreed.
- According to existing interpretation, it would be illegal for a nation to spend more on national defense than it does on children's welfare.
- Children would acquire a legally enforceable right to leisure.
- Teaching children about Christianity in schools has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC.
During the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign, then-Sen. Barack Obama promised he would pursue the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
"It's embarrassing to find ourselves in the company of Somalia, a lawless land," Obama said at the time. "I will review this and other treaties to ensure the United States resumes its global lead.” Global lead to what?
One of the first acts by Hitler when he moved into power was to create the governmental Ministry of Education and give it control of all schools and school-related issues.
In 1937, the dictator said, "The youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled. This Reich stands, and it is building itself up for the future, upon its youth. And this new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing."
This from the HSLDA; The fundamentals of the U.S. Constitution possibly have been shoved one step closer to irrelevance by the U.S. Supreme Court, which yesterday cited as support for its opinion an international treaty that has not been adopted in the U.S.
"It is bad enough for the Supreme Court to engage in judicial activism," said Michael Farris of the Home School Legal Defense Association. "It is far worse when the justices employ international law in support of their far-reaching edicts.
It would appear in light of the above that while we are busy being outraged by our irresponsible federal government spending us into oblivion, taking control of our health care and basic health decisions, throwing our borders wide open to invasion, our Secretary of State signs a small arms treaty with the U.N. without the express permission of the people, the administration using the FDA attempts to gain control of our food supplies and natural drugs and we are now in danger of losing custody of our children and all parental rights to the U.N.
When exactly did the people of this nation vote to replace our Constitution with the arbitrary will of the United Nations? When exactly did we opt to dissolve our Republic in favor of Global Democracy and place ourselves under totalitarian mob rule? The magician has indeed been very busy with that left hand while we are watching the right.
It is a grand illusion today when Americans consider themselves free. Our nation has been invaded, our liberties dissolved and our freedom is nothing more than smoke and mirrors, a false sense of security allowed to exist while the Global Agenda is secured by the final nails in the coffin of the Great American Experiment, The United States of America.
THE HARSH TRUTH ABOUT PUBLIC SCHOOLS… Bruce N. Shortt
It is based, first of all, upon a clear understanding of God's educational mandate to parents. Its second foundation is a thoroughly documented description of the inescapably anti-Christian thrust of any governmental school system and the inevitable results: moral relativism (no fixed standards), academic dumbing down, far-left programs, near absence of discipline, and the persistent but pitiable rationalizations offered by government education professionals.
THE BEAST ON THE EAST RIVER…. Nathan Tabor
Do not underestimate the driving force of the United Nations toward global control and the downfall of American life as we know it.
Tabor references one UN publications statement that in order to promote a global mindset, they will indoctrinate the education system to eradicate the nationalistic, individualistic ideology. According to Tabor, the UN's goal is "to overcome the deep-seated attitudes of self-reliance, individualism, and independence that have permeated American thought and culture for generations." American teachers are encouraged by the UN and the National Education Association to employ “state-approved, politically correct attitudes.”
Their goal is world government and domination. Tabor states that there are three steps that must happen before the UN can become a world government. First, the UN will seek a permanent source of income so that it will no longer rely on individual nation-states. Second, the UN will create its own judicial system to replace the settled and customary laws of individual nations. Finally, the UN needs to build its own separate and independent military.
IS IT, OR IS IT NOT, TIME TO SAVE OUR NATION?