Tuesday, August 31, 2010


The fact that something is fundamentally wrong in America today is almost impossible to miss, but what is it at that fundamental level which defines the cancer which is eating our once great nation away at its core?
The answer is found in the most fundamental aspect of America, her language. Somewhere along the line the English language contained in Webster’s dictionary has been replaced by the progressive’s promotion of alternative definitions. The words of our founders are twisted to fit political agenda, words like “among” in our Constitution somehow miraculously become other words like “within” in order to justify the unconstitutional passing of laws by a bloated federal government but that is merely an effect not a cause. The cause lies in the alternative definition of one word, the word which defines the nation. That word is Republic!
The erosion of our liberties and the destruction of this nation begins for us at an early age when first we attend school. Today our children are taught the United States is a Democracy. Even our President refers to it as such. We are hard pressed to find a single adult person on the street who knows that it is not a Democracy or what the difference is between that and the Republic which our founders gave us.
We could spend hours here defining the difference but for the sake of simplicity and space I will put it plainly. In a Democracy 5 wolves and 1 sheep would vote on what to have for lunch and the sheep ends up on a spit over a slow flame, why, because Democracy is “Mob Rule.” In a Republic the sheep gets an equal voice and lunch will more likely involve a nice Caesar Salad.
"It does not take a majority to prevail...but rather an irate, tireless minority , keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
Why then are we taught a blatant lie about the very foundation of our nation? There is a difference between deliberate lies and the continuation of them. The alternative definition began long ago when the Progressive movement gained power in the early 1900’s. Back then it was a blatant lie, today it is an unintentional lie on the part of our children’s teachers. They are not purposely teaching our children falsehoods; they are simply teaching forward that which they have been taught.
Some might say, “well so what, does it really matter what we call it?”, oh yes indeed it does matter. It matters because of the motive behind the lie, not the lie itself. The motive is couched in the definition of Democracy, “Mob Rule”, and the Progressive agenda.
On the extreme left wing of the Democratic Party, within our Congress, there is a Progressive Caucus which is affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA. The DSA is the American affiliate of the Socialist International. Socialists believe in subverting and transforming the system from our Republic free market system to a Communistic collective one by “boring from within.” They prefer deceptive legislation even if passed by duplicitous means to achieve their goals as they know the American people are basically still a society grounded in traditional liberties. These Congressmen have gone to great lengths to disguise their authoritarian colors when seeking office. They may walk and talk like the rest of us and even seem to be sympathetic to our concerns but the reality is they are dedicated to a “fundamental transformation” (where have we heard that one before?) of our nation into a One World Communist Style government. Their actions are obvious when we see Congress turn a blind eye to higher taxes, runaway spending, nationalization of private enterprise and health care, federal opposition to closed borders, massive entitlement program expansion to the vilification of every day Americans and even the nation itself as our president dedicates himself to the destruction of international friendships in favor of alliances with the enemies of the free world.
The single most successful attack on our Republic from the progressive movement is the slow disintegration of our educational system and the resultant self entitlement attitudes of our youth. All it takes to convince an entire society to go along with Socialist Communism is to replace the definition of the word “right” in our documents from that of inalienable God given right to the conception that it means “want”. We have an entire generation of individuals now who basically believe they have a “right” to whatever they “want” and that it is the government’s duty to provide it for them. The concept of personal responsibility has no place in a Socialist society. Indeed the concept of “self” is obliterated by the notion of collectivism.
America has battled Communists in war, in propaganda campaigns, in the media and as late as the 50’s, in our schools…. Only to find they have done exactly what they said they would do, “take America from within”, as they are right in front of our faces sitting in our United States Congress busily putting their heads together to find ways to subvert our Constitution and shove their agenda down the throats of the people even if they have to do it behind closed doors or resort to bribery, blackmail or the character assassination of those who disagree. These people support and promote a welfare state that oppresses poor people, especially minorities, who then become their constituents, left-wing judges who are willing to subvert the democratic power of Congress by making laws from the bench ,mandatory public education, mandatory labor unions, mandatory racial quotas, mandatory health care, land-grabbing environmental regulation and thought control in the form of hate speech legislation, then they turn around and become downright libertarian when it comes to pornography, abortion, sex, drugs and other agendas which destroy American values.
Who are these Socialist Marxists members of the DSA in our Congress?
Eni Faleomavaega
American Samoa
Ed Pastor
Barbara Lee
Bob Filner
Diane Watson
Esteban Edward Torres
Fortney "Pete" Stark
George Miller
Henry A. Waxman
Lynn C Woolsey
Maxine Waters
Nancy Pelosi
Sam Farr
Xavier Becerra
Diane DeGette
Rosa DeLauro
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Alcee L. Hastings
Corrine Brown
John Lewis
Bobby Rush
Danny Davis
Jan Schakowsky
Jesse Jackson
Lane Evans
Luis Gutierrez
Julia Carson
Barney Frank
Jim McGovern
John Olver
John Tierney
Michael Capuano
David Bonior
John Conyers
Lynn N. Rivers
Paul Wellstone
Bennie G. Thompson
William "Lacy" Clay
Donald Payne
New Jersey
Tom Udall
New Mexico
Charles Rangel
New York
Jerrold Nadler
New York
John LaFalce
New York
Jose E. Serrano
New York
Major Owens
New York
Maurice Hinchey
New York
Nydia M. Velazquez
New York
Melvin L. Watt
North Carolina
Dennis Kucinich
Marcy Kaptur
Sherrod Brown
Elizabeth Furse
Peter A. DeFazio
Chaka Fattah
William Coyne
Carlos A. Romero-Barcelo
Puerto Rico
Sheila Jackson-Lee
Bernard Sanders
Robert C. Scott
James A McDermott
Tammy Baldwin

Some members of the Socialist Party have moved on to higher ranks of influence such as;
Hillary Clinton – Secretary of State
Hilda Solis – Secretary of Labor
Barack Obama - President
Many of these so-called leaders maintain close personal friendships with Communist leaders around the world like Fidel Castro. They validate and praise the heinous acts of maniacal animals like Hugo Chavez and Che Guevara These people follow the agenda laid out for them by the DSA and therefore their allegiance is not to the United States of America but to a foreign body. This of course, according to our Constitution, Article I, Section 9;
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States; And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.”,
Is High Treason and while that would most certainly carry a possible death penalty should they be tried, it is also an impeachable offense however only the Senate can do that and they too are infiltrated on both sides of the isle with enough individuals whose interests do not lie in the security of this nation or her sovereignty, to prevent any impeachment proceedings from taking place.
Even though this president has gone to great lengths to surround himself with avowed Communists and place them in positions of power it is important to point out that the Socialist legislations and policies did not begin with him. Remember for instance that the MIAC Report lists identifying everyday Americans as enemies of the state and the Patriot Act designed to dissolve American liberties, the false flag event of 9/11 (explanation here), and the deliberate collapse of our economy was begun during the Bush administration. While Democrats are now blatantly subverting the nation, the Republicans are far worse; they don’t have an up front and visual Socialistic Caucus from which we can easily identify them.
It is evident when watching the growing Tea Party movement or the numbers in attendance at the recent Restoring Honor Rally on August 28th, the people have committed themselves to cleaning out Washington D.C. come November, but what they don’t realize is that by booting the Democrats out of power and replacing them with Republicans they will have done nothing more than switch players on the same team.
Those of us old enough to remember the 50’s when we were put through nuclear attack drills in school, where we crouched under our desks, (yes I know how ridiculous that is and I did feel rather silly under that desk), also know the true history of Socialist regimes. We know for example that all Socialist regimes in the history of the world have led to massive suffering, genocide, pestilence and starvation, police state executions of those who opposed and the devastation of whole cultures. So why would seemingly intelligent adult human beings be so hell bent on transforming America into one? Simple, they truly think they are smarter than all who have gone before them and the only reason their Utopian Fantasy has never worked is because it just wasn’t done right.
Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50) 78 million deaths
Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945)  12,000,000 (concentration camps and civilians WWII)
Fidel Castro (Cuba, 1959-1999) 30,000 executions
On Labor day 2010 the Marxist and Socialist movements are calling for a push to orginize a new political party.  The “Labor Party”.   Joel Rogers of COWS and Apollo Alliance, ( Apollo authored Obama’s Stimulus package) started out setting up a 3rd party based on Marxist philosophy in the mid 1990s
Socialists will not stop until their collective thirst for power is satisfied.  New York already suffers from a similar madness with the  “Working Families Party” ,using Fusion Politics to elect 3rd party candidates to skew the election by posting candidates of the WFP on both Democrat and Republican ballots.
It is interesting how a Google search on working falmilies party shows the organizations website in the company of Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA
For those who doubt the existence of a Communist agenda in the current administration, think back on what then “Senator Barack Obama”, said during his campaign for the presidency….. "Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself.”………..
1.   In his words, “The Best Education I ever had”… Saul Alinsky who taught him the use of class warfare, Trojan Horse tactics, hidden motives by deception, master manipulation and how to instill a feeling of total defeat in the opponent.
2.   Gregory Galluzzo.. Alinsky’s “Greatest Disciple” who taught him collective property ownership, the principles of wealth redistribution, the need for power and militant activism.
3.   Frank Marshall Davis, Communist leader and author who bitterly opposed Capitalism. Mr. Marshall praised the Soviet Red Army, was under FBI investigation and fled to Hawaii from Chicago. He was Obama’s childhood mentor in Hawaii from age 10 to 19.
4.   Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Black Liberation Theologist who was Obama’s pastor for over 20 years and was his “father figure”. Reverend Wright is well known for his practice of condemning America, instilling Class and Racial Warfare and claims the U.S. Government created AIDS to “kill blacks.”
5.   Louis Farrakhan, a radical Muslim leader with ties to the Black Panthers (would explain why two of those ranks were allowed to intimidate voters and get away with it), who calls Obama “the Messiah”, states “Allah will destroy America because America is the Great Satan”
6.   Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, a Radical Muslim Black Panther who funded Obama’s education. This one is truly scary when in his words, “There will be the largest bloodbath in America” or “Tear the flesh out of the white people, don’t worry Allah want you to do it.”
7.   Michelle Obama, his wife who calls America, “just downright mean” and said “for the first time in 26 years I am proud of my country.” She views America as strictly Black vs White and regularly quotes Saul Alinsky in her speech.
8.   ACORN, an organization who’s Socialist Welfare Agenda uses the poor as leverage, pushes wealth redistribution, trains militant activists, pushed sub-prime mortgages and has perpetrated massive voter fraud. Obama trained ACORN on Alinsky, paid them $832k in July of 2008 and served as their attorney.
9.   Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers, Self-Proclaimed Communists and members of the “Weather Underground” who claim among other things….”I didn’t bomb America enough”(said that on 9/11), “Kill the rich people”, and plotted to overthrow the U.S. Government.

These associations were before Obama became the president. It has since become much, much worse. He has filled his cabinet with czars who are among the most extreme radical ideologues in the world today.
How did this happen you might ask? It happened because somehow, we missed the existence of the Elephant In The Room! That Elephant was not Obama or any of his radical friends, that Elephant has a different name, its name is COMMUNISM!
Our government, including all three branches, from the Congress to the White House has already been taken by the oldest enemy of civilization, Socialism, so there is nothing left to do but abandon it. We must do as our founding fathers instructed us to do in the Declaration of Independence….
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
It is up to you the people to choose……… Communist One World Slavery or Freedom and Liberty………..You can slump to your knees, accept what has happened to you, never to rise again; or you can stand with your fellow Patriot Americans and re-inhabit our rightful government under the original Constitution our founders gave us.
What say you?   
To discover how the plan plays out….Atlas Shrugged..Ayn Rand
Obama’s true background… The Obama Nation..Jerome R. Corsi
To learn the true history of Socialism and Communism, Google the following and read the descriptions given by Wikipedia

Monday, August 30, 2010


The Second Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America reads:
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Common sense and logic when reading those words should suffice as definition but today it seems not only our federal government but an ever increasing portion of our populace doesn’t possess the mental acuity to apply those principles.
There are no less than four constitutional barriers to federal gun control. The first one is obvious if you’ve ever read the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, the power to enact any control over guns or any other type of defense is simply not there. The language used in the Second Amendment is “the right to keep and bear arms”. Notice there is no implication that this right is only by government permission. The Declaration of Independence states that the “rights” of the people are inalienable and bestowed by man’s Creator, therefore since government does not create these rights, government cannot rescind them.
Second, the 2nd Amendment clearly forbids the government from any act which might “infringe” upon that right.  The word “infringe” means to limit or stand in the way of. It’s possible that no one in all three branches of our federal government has ever looked that word up. Do we have a national dictionary?
Third, the 9th Amendment asserts that the people have “retained” other rights besides those enumerated in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (first ten amendments). It is not hard to understand that since the Declaration of Independence expressly guaranteed the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, it also guarantees the right to defend them against violence. Considering that in the 1700’s the possible sources of said violence could be from the King’s Soldiers, the local Indian Tribes, the French, the Spanish and a host of natural predators in the regions of the 13 colonies, its probably not mere assumption that the founders were not implying that the people should protect their lives and liberties with pitch forks. Yeah, yeah today our Native Population is not out to scalp us, the French are happy slinging insults, the British are more than happy to own our capitol and run our money system and the Spanish, well they don’t even occupy Mexico anymore but we do have a whole host of sources of violence against us to contend with; gangs, murderers, rapists, child molesters and our own overblown federal government that puts us on a potential domestic terrorist list if we object to anything it does or, “oh my”, we own a gun.
Fourth, the 10th Amendment contains the principle that all powers not “delegated” (meaning assigned to), to the federal government are “reserved” (held for), to the states and the people. The Constitution clearly does not delegate gun-control to Congress and therefore Congress has no such power.
All four of these reasons should be sufficient to impart the simple fact that the federal government has no venue in the area of gun-control. The 2nd Amendment was added to the Constitution so that even liberals would get the point.
In the words of James Madison in The Federalist Papers (No. 45), the powers of the federal government were to be “few and defined.” The idea of federal power to regulate guns is certainly not “defined”; in fact it is explicitly denied.
“The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms” Samuel Adams, during the Massachusetts convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788).”
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” Thomas Jefferson
Pursuant to the purpose of the Bill of Rights being to limit federal government, the 2nd Amendment ensures the federal government will never obtain a monopoly of weaponry. Liberals repeatedly invoke Congress to regulate interstate commerce (which by the way is also a false claim to power since the word among does not mean within), to cover anything they want to regulate. However common sense, (oops there’s that silly concept again), dictates that if the Constitution meant “within” as opposed to “among”, slavery and alcohol consumption – both of which involve interstate commerce – could have been banned by simple acts of Congress. We all know that is not the case.
Liberals often contradict themselves in the attempt to skew the meaning of the Constitution. For instance; they claim the 14th Amendment requires the states to respect the same rights the federal government may not violate but then retract that when claiming that does not apply to the right to keep and bear arms. When first we practice to deceive (to our own ends), we should be careful to avoid forgetting whatever ridiculous claim we may have previously uttered so as not to appear too overtly absurd.
The issue of the 2nd Amendment’s true meaning has today become a hotly contested political debate. A debate which has no basis in common sense but instead seems rooted in the partisan concepts of right vs left.  To the right of the center line, (fence sitters who sway with political winds and expediency) are conservatives who tend to accept the Constitution the way it is written and insist on it being observed to the letter. To the left are liberals who are not content with the founders and more and more unwilling to abide by their wishes. They are the ones who will tell you the Constitution is out dated and irrelevant in order to push their own views and obtain more power than the document has delegated to them. Today we are being assaulted from every direction by radical liberals who have decided that only they know what is best for the country. A conservative will say that each individual must decide for himself what is right and what is wrong and live his life accordingly keeping in mind that should he choose wrong he is subject both to the laws of God, and of man and will have to pay the consequences of his unwise choice. A liberal thinks the average individual is too stupid to think for themselves in the first place and therefore must be controlled and herded like sheep in order to be forced to see things through the eyes of those who are smarter than they are. Neither side is above the use of persuasion grounded in falsehood to win the debate.
In our founder’s day a lie was a lie, a pure fabrication of the human mind for personal gain of one kind or another. Today we have the ever popular concept of Political Correctness (PC), so we call it something much more benign. Now in the supposedly enlightened 21st century we refer to outright lies and fabrication as “spin”.  Those accepting this definition who still attempt to follow and obey the Ten Commandments and that pesky one that says “thou shalt not bear false witness”, can now feel better when they spout twisted interpretations of the founder’s words because it does not say “thou shalt not spin.” I think there may be some argument on that point when judgment day arrives and I don’t think Moses would have been convinced.
 In any case it is simply unacceptable to in any way for any reason attempt to skew the words of our founders and their original intent which is easily obtained through their readily available writings in their own words, for personal or political gain period. Imagine how angry you would be if you left in your Last Will and Testament, the instruction that you be cremated and your ashes scattered over your favorite geographical spot but the person whom you appointed the executor of that will were to say after your death, “well I’m sure he didn’t really mean cremated and scattered since that is going to be both costly and time consuming so we’ll just bury him in the local cemetery and then I’ll phone in a notice to the newspaper in that area and have them do a little piece on his great fondness for the place, yeah that’ll do.” I imagine men like Adams and Madison would be more than a little incensed at the attitudes and behavior toward their work today.

In 1792, Congress passed the Uniform Militia Act, which required “every free, able-bodied, white male citizen of the respective States” – between the ages of 18 and 45 – to enroll in his state’s militia. Throughout the 1800’s however, militias were slowly replaced by formations of National Guard. In 1916 Congress passed the National Defense Act, bringing the National Guard under the control of the federal government. Keep in mind, 1916 was well after the federal government had become a foreign owned corporation……
1825 The Washington District of Columbia Corporation was repealed by the NINTEENTH CONGRESS of the United States.
THE REASON FOR REPEAL: "The Corporation was in Conflict of Interest with the Sovereign Civil Governments of the States."
WALL STREET [WR GRACE, JP MORGAN, ROTHSCHILD BANKING] encouraged THE WHITE HOUSE to 're-incorporate' in order for the United States to conduct 'international commerce.'
1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).
The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dust bin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced -- in effect vandalized and sabotage -- when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title.
[V.K. DURHAM notes that : “The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES corporation” has been formerly repealed by Acts of Congress]
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not.
……and therefore had no jurisdiction over the individual State’s National Guard units in the first place and still don’t, but once again the government’s attitude was, what the people don’t know works for us.
In the first clause of the Second Amendment, which discusses the necessity of a well-regulated militia, is a reason why the people have the right to bear arms and it’s a perfectly good and should be sufficient reason but it is by no means the only reason and there is no room for change as to who has the right.
Consider this: Being a pizza delivery person John has to buy a car. Does that mean that John should buy a car only if he delivers pizza in it? What if John needs to go to the airport to pick up Mrs. John? On the other hand John does not have to deliver pizza to buy a car. By the same token the militia clause of the 2nd Amendment doesn’t have to be true for the rest of the statement to stand because John doesn’t even have to like or eat pizza to own a car.
Just as a reminder to those who would argue that modern linguistics define the meaning of our founding documents; back in the 1700’s the word militia meant all able-bodied men not organized government military force. In fact, when the documents were written there was no organized government controlled military force.
It gets progressively (no pun intended) worse in 2010…..
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the U.N. to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty.”
Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.
President G.W. Bush would have none of it as the United States is among the world’s largest exporter of small arms.  Obama’s administration is not interested in protecting the commerce of the United States or anything which would slow the collapse of the economy, in fact the use of the Small Arms Treaty to disarm Americans would be icing on the cake. Never mind that we don’t have a clue as to what language is contained in that treaty…. Hmmm brings to mind when Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it”
The pushers (this time the pun was intended) of this monstrosity claim the treaty is just to protect the world from small arms winding up in the hands of guerrilla movements and insurgents and such.  Surely they don’t mean Tea Party goers, Patriots and Little Old Ladies with “Don’t Tread On Me” bumper stickers. No, just those nasty people on the MIAC LISTS, oh I forgot, they are on the list.
One of my favorite words in the English language is “caution”, its oft wise but most times thrown to the wind especially in regard to the Globalist One World Agenda. Ask yourself this, how could a Global Organization or a hand full of power hungry self appointed elite achieve a Global Governance without the United States? Since the answer is obviously that they couldn’t, how then could the people of the United States be forced to get with the program? There are nowhere near enough dummied down far left liberals frothing at the mouth for a Global Nanny state to convince the rest of the nation to go along so the only way to do it is by force. Remember the Emperor of Japan and his opinion of the possibility of using force against the American people.
The only way to peacefully disarm America is to convince them that guns cause violence, crime, death and destruction. That’s like saying pencils are the cause of misspelled words or cars cause accidents. It doesn’t stop that kind of pea brained logic though, we hear it every day.
If you don’t think American gun ownership is the largest deterrent to crime we have, just ask the citizens of Kennesaw, Georgia where there is an ordinance requiring every head of household (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes. Crime against persons in Kennesaw since the passage of that ordinance has plummeted to near non-existent.
In Kennesaw there will be no husband in the middle of the night hearing a crash in the kitchen, hollering “Annie, git yer pitch fork, thar’s a bar in the house!”, any more than there would have been in the 1700’s. Annie will most likely hand the gun from under the bed to her husband and tell him to lock and load. After all Annie and her hubby are guaranteed the right to protect themselves by the Constitution for the United States of America……….. God willing it remains the case in perpetuity.
In Restored America, Annie’s gun will be right where she put it when she needs it…..
Gun Control, Opposing ViewpointsGreenhaven Press
Arguing With IdiotsGlen Beck
Original IntentDavid Barton