LET IT NOT BE, I'M SORRY

I COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE SAID IT BETTER….

WHEN ONLY TYRANTS HAVE GUNS

By Chip McLean

January 12, 2013

NewsWithViews.com

The death of innocents is always tragic. To feel empathy for those who lost their lives and their grieving loved ones is a normal, healthy reaction. To feel any less would be less than human. Unfortunately, a far less noble part of humanity – the “never let a good crisis go to waste” mindset of those who see human suffering as a means to an agenda – always display their ugly faces at such times. So it is with the recent Sandy Hook shootings.

Predictably, before the mourning families could even make funeral arrangements, the usual suspects were already inundating the airwaves with a cacophony of anti-gun gibberish. People such as Michael Bloomberg were already demanding “immediate action.” Naturally by “immediate action,” Bloomberg and others of his ilk mean to strip gun owners of their right to bear arms.

The gullible that rely on emotion rather than logic are easy prey for such opportunists as Bloomberg, Dianne Feinstein, Eric Holder and of course Barack Hussein Obama. Governmental anti-gun types are shameless in their efforts to exploit a tide of mindless emotionalism by advocating what they euphemistically refer to as “sensible gun laws”. While they bend over backwards attempting to sell their notions as “sensible,” there is nothing sensible about it. To these control freaks, the only solution to gun shootings is to disarm the law abiding. Take for example Obama’s flippant response to the NRA’s idea of posting armed guards in schools:

“I am not going to prejudge the recommendations that are given to me. I am skeptical that the only answer is putting more guns in schools. And I think the vast majority of the American people are skeptical that that somehow is going to solve our problem.” (emphasis added)

Such vapid “reasoning” and presumptuousness are unfortunately typical of this administration... Apparently it hasn’t dawned upon Obama et al, that high profile school shootings such as the recent Sandy Hook incident, occurred in “gun-free” zones. Ever since the passage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, students and faculty alike have become sitting ducks. By 1995, the law was found to be unconstitutional by the USSC, but in 1996 Bill Clinton, with assistance from his anti-gun zealot attorney general Janet Reno, found a “creative” means of simply bypassing the constitution and keeping this horrendous law in effect. Based on the exponential increase in school shootings (can you say Columbine, Virginia Tech and yes, Sandy Hook) it is more than safe to say that this “gun free zone” idea has been an abject failure - and has actually led to an increase in school shootings. Armed guards - or better yet - faculty members who have concealed weapon permits would provide a far more effective deterrent to lunatic Columbine wannabes, than leaving our children and teachers defenseless against such attacks.

How about rephrasing “more guns in schools” to “more guns in the right hands” Mr. Obama? That would be a “sensible” gun policy.

Here’s the dirty little secret – for all their hysterical anti-gun rhetoric, the gun grabbers really don’t care about saving lives – what they care about is power. They use tragedies like Sandy Hook to pursue their real goal, which is to disarm American citizens. They attempt to disguise their real intents, and in some cases even give lip service to the second amendment. One especially comedic example is that of John Kerry, who during his unsuccessful 2004 presidential campaign went on a photo-op “hunting” trip, complete with camos in order to show he supports “hunters”. Understand – and this is a crucial point – the second amendment isn’t about “hunting.” It never has been. The fact is that the right to bear arms was put into place by the founders as a means of protecting the citizens from tyranny. That is why would-be governmental gun grabbers hate that pesky second amendment. An armed populace is the one thing standing between them and what they want – an omnipotent central government accountable to no one and free to impose its will on a defenseless public. Sound harsh? Consider the gun policies of Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse Tung and think again…

Reading the founders’ own writings about the right to bear arms makes it quite clear what their intent was when adding the second amendment. Chuck Baldwin wrote a recent column that addresses this issue and I will repeat here two quotes he used from Thomas Jefferson and George Washington:

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson

“Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence… From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable… The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference. When firearms go, all goes.” – George Washington

In Baldwin’s follow-up column, he puts forth a three point plan of action for combatting these assaults on our freedom. I agree strongly and recommend you read Chuck’s complete column on this, but allow me to boil it down here with a couple of observations:

1) Make phone calls to our representatives and senators on Capitol Hill. It is imperative that our congress critters hear from us regarding our complete and total opposition to any new gun control measures. They need to hear from us NOW and en masse.

2) If Congress passes any new gun bill, the states themselves need to stand up to Washington – therefore our state governors and legislatures need to hear from us as well…they need to be reminded that the federal government serves at the pleasure of the people – not the other way around. When the federal government oversteps its bounds and tramples the very constitution that limits its scope, it is incumbent on the states to preserve the rights of its people. I would say that governors need to prevent the enforcement of any unconstitutional seizure of firearms by the federal government using every means at their disposal, including arresting and incarcerating any federal agent who attempts such action on the individual state’s soil.

3) Baldwin’s third point is that we as individuals must be prepared to draw a line in the sand... “(I) refuse to comply with any law requiring us to register or surrender our firearms–including our semi-automatic rifles. Ladies and gentlemen, whatever the consequences might be, and whatever anyone else does or doesn’t do, I am prepared to become an outlaw over this issue! I don’t know how to say it any plainer: I will not register my firearms, and I will not surrender my firearms. Period. End of story. It’s not just a saying with me: when my guns are outlawed, I will be an outlaw!”

Amen Chuck Baldwin! Freedom is worth fighting for – now, as it was in 1776. Our right to bear arms is the one freedom that preserves all of the others. It is time to let the Obama-coms and any spineless representatives who would simply cave in order to “get along”, know that enough is enough. It is time to let them know that their days of shredding our constitution are over, and that their idea of a socialist utopia with the elite feeding at the taxpayer trough – all the while issuing unlawful edicts to the rest of us that threaten our liberties – is not going to happen. There are millions of law abiding gun owners in this country…but an out of control federal government coming after them will do so at its own peril.

I REMEMBER MY GRANDMOTHER, BORN IN 1909, TELLING ME ABOUT THE TIME BEFORE SHE COULD VOTE AND WHAT IT TOOK TO GET THAT RIGHT. SHE WAS AMERICA’S FIRST AERONAUTICS ENGINEER ON THE WEST COAST AND LEFT HER CAREER BECAUSE SHE WAS TOLD SHE COULD NEVER ADVANCE IN PAY SCALE OR POSITION BECAUSE OF HER GENDER… SHE TAUGHT ME PERSEVERANCE AND THAT AN INDOMITABLE SPIRIT, AN INTENSE FOCUS, SHEER DETERMINATION AND AN UNSHAKABLE RESOLVE COULD AND WOULD OVER COME ADVERSITY AND TYRANNY…. GEE GUESS THAT GIVES A CLUE AS TO WHAT MAKES TERI TICK…IN ANY CASE I TOTALLY AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE AND ASK THAT ALL WOMEN AND ALL MEN WITH HALF AN OUNCE OF SENSE, READ IT AND THEN GET BUSY… TERI CAN’T LEAD ALL THE FIGHTS LOL…..

WOMAN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT AND MANDATORY VACCINATION

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO
January 12, 2013
NewsWithViews.com

What does the Women’s Suffrage Movement have to do with Mandatory Vaccination?

I'm reading a really good book right now I'd like to encourage all of you to read. "A Woman's Crusade, Alice Paul and the Battle for the Ballot" by Mary Walton is well written and an important part of our history. The fight over women's suffrage - the right to vote as a woman's right - was championed by a small group of determined women. Here's a snip from the book:

In 1848 - a mere 65 years ago - a married woman in the U.S. could not own property. She could not make a contract or a will, and could not operate a business in her own name. If she worked, her wages belonged to her husband. In Georgia, men had the right to whip their wives. If they divorced, the husband had custody of the children. The doors of most public universities were closed to women. And except for an occasional school board meeting or in an occasional municipality, a woman could not vote....

Voting, it was argued, would distract women from their sacred domestic roles and wifely duties. Men controlled the agenda. Women's rights were opposed by the powerful liquor and manufacturing establishments. Protectors of the status quo - the wealthy stake holders in oil, mining and railroads - quietly filled lawmakers' pockets and prodded them to take an anti-suffrage stand.

In 1850, Susan B Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton formed a partnership. They lead the movement to overcome the legal barriers that prohibited women from having voting equality. By 1906, both women had passed on. Fifty years of effort had won women the ballot in just four states: Wyoming, Utah, Colorado and Idaho. With the passing of the Movement's Leaders, the suffrage establishment did not die, but it had aged and had grown weary. It was said, "The Suffrage Movement bored its adherents and repelled its opponents."

Then, in 1913, the fight for women's rights was refueled by a potent combination of education, frustration, anger and courage. They had one goal: a constitutional amendment allowing women the right to vote. Their leader, Alice Paul, was a NJ Quaker. She was not only fearless, but a brilliant tactician, talented fundraiser, and a canny publicist. She gathered a cadre of fiercely determined women who vowed to not give up until they had won. And after 7 years of relentless pursuit, the 19th Amendment was ratified on August 18, 1920, giving women the right to vote. Hard to believe that less than 100 years ago, women had no voice and few rights in this country.... a benefit gained by disciplined work of a few dedicated women (and men). When working together, they didn't always agree but they were completely unified and focused on attaining the end result.

At its peak, there were only about 60,000 people involved in the suffrage battle. They railed against skepticism, ridicule, and violence. They marched in the streets. They picketed. They were arrested. Alice Paul was physically tortured when she went on a hunger strike while in jail.

What would you be willing to do, willing to tolerate, willing to face, for something you believed in?

After the 19th Amendment was passed, Alice spent the rest of her life working for equal rights for women in the US and in Europe with the League of Nations. At the age of 92, shortly before she died, she badgered her young female caretakers saying, "What was I doing when I was your age, to further the cause of women? You, you, you young people are the ones who should be taking up the mantle for the future!"

It seems those who want to refuse mandatory injections are in a similar battle that Alice Paul and her team fought -- and overcame:

• We are opposed by wealthy powers - such as the Gates Foundation and the entire Pharma industry.
• The Medical profession refuses to acknowledge the carnage of neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease being caused by vaccines - and insists on vaccines for all.
• The Insurance industry has begun setting standards for vaccine coverage doctors will have to meet to get paid.
• The Vaccine Court disallows compensation for injury, even death.
• State legislators - fueled by the vaccine lobby - want to repeal exemption laws. Even medical doctors are calling for exemptions to be repealed.
• Healthcare workers are being forced to accept a flu shot in exchange for employment and a W2 wage.
• ...And deep inside Obamacare is language to allow door-to-door vaccinators into your community, vaccinating for the Good of the Whole.

What are you willing to do to avoid mandatory vaccination?

Are you strong enough, determined enough, courageous enough, brave enough? Will you rally together for the sake of your health and the right to choose what is injected into your children? Are you willing to stay in the fight when the going gets a little tough - and the pro-vaccinators come after you? Are you willing to take a stand to draw the line that separates you from your government at the level of your skin...and the skin of your children/grand children?

Where are the 30-somethings? Those of us who are 50+ and have been at the forefront of this fight for years, we need your support. After all, what is happening now will mostly effects YOUR generation, your world. What are your unvaccinated children are going to face, if you don't take a strong stand now?

Is it time to rally together and begin? Or are we at the end....

I have long maintained that those who opposed mandatory vaccination should study the Women's Suffrage movement. And with our rights eroding on a daily basis, strategic leaders - determined men and women - need to emerge. Now. The Suffrage Movement may serve as an inspiration that leads to success: retaining your right to refuse.

© 2013 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny - All Rights Reserved

Share This Article

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Someday when I am re-united with that incredible woman who taught me so much and passed her strength and spirit on to me, I want to be able to say, yes Granny, I heard you and I was truly listening… I did everything I could think to do to carry with me everything you taught me throughout my life and to pass it on to the next generation of amazing women in our families’ future……. What will you say to your Grandmother? Let it not be, “I’m sorry, I didn’t know”.

YOU ARE THE ANSWER!