I COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE SAID IT BETTER….
WHEN
ONLY TYRANTS HAVE GUNS
By
Chip McLean
January
12, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
The death of innocents is always
tragic. To feel empathy for those who lost their lives and their grieving loved
ones is a normal, healthy reaction. To feel any less would be less than human.
Unfortunately, a far less noble part of humanity – the “never let a good crisis
go to waste” mindset of those who see human suffering as a means to an agenda –
always display their ugly faces at such times. So it is with the recent Sandy
Hook shootings.
Predictably, before the mourning
families could even make funeral arrangements, the usual suspects were already
inundating the airwaves with a cacophony of anti-gun gibberish. People such as
Michael Bloomberg were already demanding
“immediate action.” Naturally by “immediate action,” Bloomberg and others of
his ilk mean to strip gun owners of their right to bear arms.
The gullible that rely on emotion
rather than logic are easy prey for such opportunists as Bloomberg, Dianne
Feinstein, Eric Holder and of course Barack Hussein Obama. Governmental
anti-gun types are shameless in their efforts to exploit a tide of mindless
emotionalism by advocating what they euphemistically refer to as “sensible gun
laws”. While they bend over backwards attempting to sell their notions as
“sensible,” there is nothing sensible about it. To these control freaks, the
only solution to gun shootings is to disarm the law abiding. Take for example Obama’s flippant response
to the NRA’s idea of posting armed guards in schools:
“I am not going to prejudge the recommendations that are
given to me. I am skeptical that the only answer is putting more guns in
schools. And I think the vast majority of the American people are skeptical
that that somehow is going to solve our problem.” (emphasis added)
Such vapid “reasoning” and
presumptuousness are unfortunately typical of this administration... Apparently
it hasn’t dawned upon Obama et al, that high profile school shootings such as
the recent Sandy Hook incident, occurred in “gun-free” zones. Ever since the
passage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990,
students and faculty alike have become sitting ducks. By 1995, the law was
found to be unconstitutional by the USSC, but in 1996 Bill Clinton, with
assistance from his anti-gun zealot attorney general Janet Reno, found a
“creative” means of simply bypassing the constitution and keeping this
horrendous law in effect. Based on the exponential increase in school shootings
(can you say Columbine, Virginia Tech and yes, Sandy Hook) it is more than safe
to say that this “gun free zone” idea has been an abject failure - and has
actually led to an increase in school shootings. Armed guards - or
better yet - faculty members who have concealed weapon permits would provide a
far more effective deterrent to lunatic Columbine wannabes, than leaving our
children and teachers defenseless against such attacks.
How about rephrasing “more guns in
schools” to “more guns in the right hands” Mr. Obama? That would be a
“sensible” gun policy.
Here’s the dirty little secret – for
all their hysterical anti-gun rhetoric, the gun grabbers really don’t care
about saving lives – what they care about is power. They use tragedies like
Sandy Hook to pursue their real goal, which is to disarm American citizens.
They attempt to disguise their real intents, and in some cases even give lip
service to the second amendment. One especially comedic example is that of John
Kerry, who during his unsuccessful 2004 presidential campaign went on a
photo-op “hunting” trip, complete with camos in order to show he supports
“hunters”. Understand – and this is a crucial point – the second amendment
isn’t about “hunting.” It never has been. The fact is that the
right to bear arms was put into place by the founders as a means of protecting
the citizens from tyranny. That is why would-be governmental gun grabbers hate
that pesky second amendment. An armed populace is the one thing standing
between them and what they want – an omnipotent central government accountable
to no one and free to impose its will on a defenseless public. Sound harsh?
Consider the gun policies of Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse Tung and
think again…
Reading the founders’ own writings
about the right to bear arms makes it quite clear what their intent was when
adding the second amendment. Chuck Baldwin wrote a recent column that addresses this issue
and I will repeat here two quotes he used from Thomas Jefferson and George
Washington:
“The strongest reason for the people
to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect
themselves against tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson
“Firearms stand next in importance
to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and
keystone under independence… From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present
day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security,
and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable… The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference. When firearms
go, all goes.” – George Washington
In Baldwin’s follow-up column, he puts forth a three
point plan of action for combatting these assaults on our freedom. I agree
strongly and recommend you read Chuck’s complete column on this, but allow me
to boil it down here with a couple of observations:
1) Make phone calls to our
representatives and senators on Capitol Hill. It is imperative that our
congress critters hear from us regarding our complete and total opposition to
any new gun control measures. They need to hear from us NOW and en masse.
2) If Congress passes any new gun
bill, the states themselves need to stand up to Washington – therefore our
state governors and legislatures need to hear from us as well…they need to be
reminded that the federal government serves at the pleasure of the people – not
the other way around. When the federal government oversteps its bounds and
tramples the very constitution that limits its scope, it is incumbent on the
states to preserve the rights of its people. I would say that governors need to
prevent the enforcement of any unconstitutional seizure of firearms by the
federal government using every means at their disposal, including arresting and
incarcerating any federal agent who attempts such action on the individual
state’s soil.
3) Baldwin’s third point is that we as individuals must be
prepared to draw a line in the sand... “(I) refuse to comply with any law
requiring us to register or surrender our firearms–including our semi-automatic
rifles. Ladies and gentlemen, whatever the consequences might be, and whatever
anyone else does or doesn’t do, I am prepared to become an outlaw over this
issue! I don’t know how to say it any plainer: I will not register my firearms,
and I will not surrender my firearms. Period. End of story. It’s not just a
saying with me: when my guns are outlawed, I will be an outlaw!”
Amen Chuck Baldwin! Freedom is worth
fighting for – now, as it was in 1776. Our right to bear arms is the one
freedom that preserves all of the others. It is time to let the Obama-coms and
any spineless representatives who would simply cave in order to “get along”,
know that enough is enough. It is time to let them know that their days of
shredding our constitution are over, and that their idea of a socialist utopia
with the elite feeding at the taxpayer trough – all the while issuing unlawful
edicts to the rest of us that threaten our liberties – is not going to happen.
There are millions of law abiding gun owners in this country…but an out of control
federal government coming after them will do so at its own peril.
I REMEMBER MY GRANDMOTHER, BORN IN 1909, TELLING ME ABOUT
THE TIME BEFORE SHE COULD VOTE AND WHAT IT TOOK TO GET THAT RIGHT. SHE WAS
AMERICA’S FIRST AERONAUTICS ENGINEER ON THE WEST COAST AND LEFT HER CAREER
BECAUSE SHE WAS TOLD SHE COULD NEVER ADVANCE IN PAY SCALE OR POSITION BECAUSE
OF HER GENDER… SHE TAUGHT ME PERSEVERANCE AND THAT AN INDOMITABLE SPIRIT, AN
INTENSE FOCUS, SHEER DETERMINATION AND AN UNSHAKABLE RESOLVE COULD AND WOULD OVER
COME ADVERSITY AND TYRANNY…. GEE GUESS THAT GIVES A CLUE AS TO WHAT MAKES TERI
TICK…IN ANY CASE I TOTALLY AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE AND ASK THAT ALL WOMEN AND ALL MEN WITH HALF AN OUNCE OF SENSE, READ IT AND
THEN GET BUSY… TERI CAN’T LEAD ALL THE FIGHTS LOL…..
WOMAN'S
SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT AND MANDATORY VACCINATION
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO
January 12, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
January 12, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
What does the Women’s Suffrage
Movement have to do with Mandatory Vaccination?
I'm reading a really good book right
now I'd like to encourage all of you to read. "A Woman's Crusade, Alice
Paul and the Battle for the Ballot" by Mary Walton is well written and an
important part of our history. The fight over women's suffrage - the right to
vote as a woman's right - was championed by a small group of determined women.
Here's a snip from the book:
In 1848 - a mere 65 years ago - a
married woman in the U.S. could not own property. She could not make a contract
or a will, and could not operate a business in her own name. If she worked, her
wages belonged to her husband. In Georgia, men had the right to whip their
wives. If they divorced, the husband had custody of the children. The doors of
most public universities were closed to women. And except for an occasional
school board meeting or in an occasional municipality, a woman could not
vote....
Voting, it was argued, would
distract women from their sacred domestic roles and wifely duties. Men
controlled the agenda. Women's rights were opposed by the powerful liquor and
manufacturing establishments. Protectors of the status quo - the wealthy stake
holders in oil, mining and railroads - quietly filled lawmakers' pockets and
prodded them to take an anti-suffrage stand.
In 1850, Susan B Anthony and
Elizabeth Cady Stanton formed a partnership. They lead the movement to overcome
the legal barriers that prohibited women from having voting equality. By 1906,
both women had passed on. Fifty years of effort had won women the ballot in
just four states: Wyoming, Utah, Colorado and Idaho. With the passing of the
Movement's Leaders, the suffrage establishment did not die, but it had aged and
had grown weary. It was said, "The Suffrage Movement bored its adherents
and repelled its opponents."
Then, in 1913, the fight for women's
rights was refueled by a potent combination of education, frustration, anger
and courage. They had one goal: a constitutional amendment allowing women the
right to vote. Their leader, Alice Paul, was a NJ Quaker. She was not only
fearless, but a brilliant tactician, talented fundraiser, and a canny
publicist. She gathered a cadre of fiercely determined women who vowed to not
give up until they had won. And after 7 years of relentless pursuit, the 19th
Amendment was ratified on August 18, 1920, giving women the right to vote. Hard
to believe that less than 100 years ago, women had no voice and few rights in
this country.... a benefit gained by disciplined work of a few dedicated women
(and men). When working together, they didn't always agree but they were
completely unified and focused on attaining the end result.
At its peak, there were only about
60,000 people involved in the suffrage battle. They railed against skepticism,
ridicule, and violence. They marched in the streets. They picketed. They were
arrested. Alice Paul was physically tortured when she went on a hunger strike
while in jail.
What would you be willing to do,
willing to tolerate, willing to face, for something you believed in?
After the 19th Amendment was passed,
Alice spent the rest of her life working for equal rights for women in the US
and in Europe with the League of Nations. At the age of 92, shortly before she
died, she badgered her young female caretakers saying, "What was I doing
when I was your age, to further the cause of women? You, you, you young people
are the ones who should be taking up the mantle for the future!"
It seems those who want to refuse
mandatory injections are in a similar battle that Alice Paul and her team
fought -- and overcame:
•
We are opposed by wealthy powers - such as the Gates Foundation and the entire
Pharma industry.
• The Medical profession refuses to acknowledge the carnage of neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease being caused by vaccines - and insists on vaccines for all.
• The Insurance industry has begun setting standards for vaccine coverage doctors will have to meet to get paid.
• The Vaccine Court disallows compensation for injury, even death.
• State legislators - fueled by the vaccine lobby - want to repeal exemption laws. Even medical doctors are calling for exemptions to be repealed.
• Healthcare workers are being forced to accept a flu shot in exchange for employment and a W2 wage.
• ...And deep inside Obamacare is language to allow door-to-door vaccinators into your community, vaccinating for the Good of the Whole.
• The Medical profession refuses to acknowledge the carnage of neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease being caused by vaccines - and insists on vaccines for all.
• The Insurance industry has begun setting standards for vaccine coverage doctors will have to meet to get paid.
• The Vaccine Court disallows compensation for injury, even death.
• State legislators - fueled by the vaccine lobby - want to repeal exemption laws. Even medical doctors are calling for exemptions to be repealed.
• Healthcare workers are being forced to accept a flu shot in exchange for employment and a W2 wage.
• ...And deep inside Obamacare is language to allow door-to-door vaccinators into your community, vaccinating for the Good of the Whole.
What are you willing to do to avoid
mandatory vaccination?
Are you strong enough, determined
enough, courageous enough, brave enough? Will you rally together for the sake
of your health and the right to choose what is injected into your children? Are
you willing to stay in the fight when the going gets a little tough - and the
pro-vaccinators come after you? Are you willing to take a stand to draw the
line that separates you from your government at the level of your skin...and
the skin of your children/grand children?
Where are the 30-somethings? Those
of us who are 50+ and have been at the forefront of this fight for years, we
need your support. After all, what is happening now will mostly effects YOUR
generation, your world. What are your unvaccinated children are going to face,
if you don't take a strong stand now?
Is it time to rally together and
begin? Or are we at the end....
I have long maintained that those
who opposed mandatory vaccination should study the Women's Suffrage movement.
And with our rights eroding on a daily basis, strategic leaders - determined
men and women - need to emerge. Now. The Suffrage Movement may serve as an
inspiration that leads to success: retaining your right to refuse.
© 2013 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny - All
Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someday when I am re-united with that incredible woman
who taught me so much and passed her strength and spirit on to me, I want to be
able to say, yes Granny, I heard you and I was truly listening… I did
everything I could think to do to carry with me everything you taught me
throughout my life and to pass it on to the next generation of amazing women in
our families’ future……. What will you say to your Grandmother? Let it not be,
“I’m sorry, I didn’t know”.
YOU ARE THE ANSWER!
