DEATH THROES PART 1

Many people have asked me to explain why I have not written and posted any articles here lately. I had intended to wait until the investigation I mention below had been completed as I did not want to inadvertantly hamper the efforts of those responsible for conducting it.  The investigation is not yet completed and therefore I will not discuss any aspects of it at this time. Other issues however, have arisen in the interim.

There has been planned and announced a seminar to be held on the 24^th of August at the Hampton Inn, in Henderson, Nevada. The purpose of the seminar is to promote the bogus Turner Freedom Docs and UCC1 process which at best will fail miserably, at worst, land a person in jail. It is claimed the process has been tweaked and is brought to you by another so called freedom guru, Mr. Lou, who also has no credentials of success. For a mere five thousand dollars you can sit through false claims, fabricated lien stories and worthless rhetoric. If you have that kind of money to waste on a scam and choose to attend let's hope you at least get a little amusement and entertainment out of it because what you will not walk away with is remedy.

This must be some sort of bogo sale though because after some inquiry I discovered the last time Mr. Lou brought this amazing opportunity forth it was ten thousand a seat! Those people even after six months of “instruction” since this past January, were never given what was promised nor did any achieve SPC status.

Turner has claimed he has nothing to do with this seminar...really? That's funny because on a private call he admitted it's his. Here is the web site: http://youhavetheright.com/home/

Follow the links, notice the videos of Tim's former seminars and his silly lien stories. Click all the tabs and then you decide, is Tim Turner not involved? If not, why is he allowing the use of his name and documents? Never mind he never created the process to begin with but in reality stole it from three different sources, regardless what he claims. A call to the Dothan Courthouse Clerk to ask about Turner's alleged liens would be quite enlightening. All his liens were dismissed voluntarily in February of 2010. If the process were valid and Turner was so successful, why dismiss the liens? Where is the money he claims to have won? Why have dozens of people ended up on the wrong side of the law when following his advice? Why has there not been a single individual in all this time coming forward with testimony of success after using the process much less documented evidence of it?

Testimony from an unsuspecting victim:

“I did the tim turner process (UCC filings), Ron Brekke (1099&OID filings), Douglas Riddle (A4V process) none produced anything positive. Ron Brekke has been indicted in tax fraud scheme.I have been issued a $5,000.00 dollar FF penalty by IRS. the interest keeps going up on it and I'm not sure what is my next move. I certainly don't want to be taken to jail. I'm a minister registered as a Corp Sole...advise...please”

While it amazes me that people will fork over any amount of money for something not proven to provide remedy they may be in dire need of, I find it downright despicable that there are people willing to exploit those in desperate situations to line their own pockets. There is a very great difference between covering your overhead when bringing much needed information to light for the benefit of others and fleecing the innocent just because you can. A little common sense and some due diligence will reveal why, even though the court is wrong and you may be right you will never be allowed to win. You may think you are winning when debts are paid or mortgages are released only to find months later that the I.R.S. Has filed F.F. Charges against you in federal court and levied you with not only the amount you thought you won but exhorbitant fines and penalties. Even if you can somehow pay and satisfy those assessments you will still have the criminal charges to deal with. Why? Simple, the court system is based on public policy not the law and if you were allowed to truly win it would bring down the whole system. Not happening and these guys know it....

"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed"

... declared the United States Supreme Court in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442 (1886).

Along those lines comes another issue; Turner's claims to exclusive cash in procedures for the Iraqi Dinar after revaluation. Nathan Peachey was quoted recently when he claimed during a Pennsylvania Assembly meeting that no American would be able to exchange their dinar except through Turner! That is almost but not quite as absurd as an email I was forwarded where Nathan informed a person he must “repent” to Tim Turner!

This ridiculous dog and pony show gets increasingly more ludicrous as the months go by and would have some value if only in comic entertainment if it weren't causing personal harm to so many. Innocent people are still being misled into “signing” up and as long as that is the case the long term danger to the public remains. In a perfect world people would ask the tough questions and demand truthful answers before becoming involved but sadly this is not by a long shot, a perfect world.

New stories of personal attack continue to come forth such as that of a single grandmother raising her grandchildren alone who has a blog talk radio show. When she “signed” up with RuSa and it became known that she had the show Turner's crew expected her to turn over the structure of the show to become a sort of on going “Republic” commericial. She refused but did allow them to have one hour per week to promote.

When she refused to allow RuSa to dominate her show the “governor” (silly title of fantasy office), of her state cautioned Turner and company that “she might be a problem and needed watching”.  Shortly after that when listeners began calling into the radio show asking the tough hard questions RuSA avoids at all cost and there was a guest speaker on the call with an opposing vision as to how to restore this great nation she became an official target just as many of us gone before her.

First she received a threatening call from the dipstick these people refer to as the Chief of Security in RuSA, Timothy Pledger and was told that she would either delete the recording of her previous show, stop having opposing guests and dissallow ANY NEGATIVE questions or comments regarding the “Republic” or she would be dragged in front of a grand jury, tried and prosecuted for sedition and treason.

This team of de facto flunkies have made a habit of disrespecting and sorely underestimating strong intelligent women and this case was no exception. Instead of the desired effect of fear and submission the threatening call was meant to instill, it back fired in a big way. The woman stood her ground and showed the idiots what she was made of. Following that Mr. Pledger took another tack by email; my comments in red....

Hey Deatra,

I want you to know that a list is being compiled regarding people who have been engaging in sedition acts against the Republic for the unites States of America, including those who have said or written injurious things against it and its officers without proof. Gee is this guy related to Obama? The word is seditious Timmy. We have freedom of speech, but that does not authorize injurious statements; and some will pay for their evil. Once again we see convenient interpretation of the Bill of Rights to suit agenda. Guess what Timmy anybody can say anything they like. That's the meaning of freedom of speech. What stands out so incredibly is the complete lack of defense and offer of proof when individuals begin pointing out the flaws, the lies or the scams. That which comes forth is attack on the messenger.  For months, evidences have been gathered and filed and are being sorted and compiled regarding each of the names on the list. Those who have made slanderous or libelous statements against leaders of the Republic are going to be prosecuted, and those who have engaged in seditious behavior will also be prosecuted. What kind of drugs are you on? Keep dreaming guys your threats are silly and your standing is non-existent. In the words of one of your Ambassadors as to enforcement when asked about it, “well their names will be known”! By the way what law are you going to use to justify this farce, the Trading With The Enemy Act, the Patriot Act? Hey why not, you've already committed to cooperating with the U.N., a Communist Organization run by the CFR and the Trillateral Commission. A team has already been assembled, and the legal staff-members are being arranged. Your staying the course and refraining from unfounded speech or writing, and your official statement affirming the Republic and its lawful processes will go a long way toward you securing a place of honor in the developing history of the lawful re-inhabitation of de jure government here in America. Excuse me? Are you asking this woman to swear an oath in writing to support this fiasco and not utter a negative word or truth where she finds it? The one thing that has been one hundred percent established is that there is absolutely NOTHING DE JURE going on here! Changing the name of national to general does not change what it is. A pig is a pig even in a velvet dress!

Furthermore, your not buying into the errant doctrines of detracters and seditioners/subverters will further secure the Republic and the people who have re-inhabited it. I caution you to be very careful regarding Roger Mundy and David Meola. Ah, I see freedom of speech only works when you claim the right to it. Thank you for clearing that up, only Turner's sycophantic bully boys are allowed to speak negatively of others.

I am glad to be getting to know you; and I look forward to the widespread manifestation of your honor in the matter of advancing our Republic. Indeed, the woman's honor is being manifested in a widespread manner, on her radio show. With truth, valuable education, respect for her guests and common dencency. What a novel idea.

The table is turning on the de facto machine. Many prophecies from different people around the world confirm and agree that we will successfully obtain the shift of power and governmental control. And that is as likely as Turner manning up and telling the truth. I don't suggest you hold your breath. For security reasons, I can’t tell you details, but evidence tends to agree with the prophecies; and I fully expect that the faithful will be rewarded with obvious dominion. The FEMA camps? They may come in handy for the de facto actors who refuse to submit to lawful government. J Absolutely! Let's not forget to threaten the woman with the camps again. Another thing that DOES NOT EXIST in the Turner Fantasy Republic is anything which could be remotely construed as LAWFUL!

There is also a plan afoot to divide our Republic and draw away members. I caution you regarding Mary Heiler of Florida and others in her camp. I believe if you do thorough due diligence that you will discover that the approach is not sound and is against the Republic. I don’t know how familiar you are with her and her agenda. Here you go again slandering ladies. Hmmm what is their approach? It's nuts really, they are of the opinion that the people must take this country back from the ground up (that means bottom up, you know exactly opposite of what you are doing). And God forbid they even have the idea that the states are sovereign and free and the Constitution only provides for a teeny weeny limited federal level. OUTRAGEOUS! On top of that they think only the people can elect a president!!! Now that's just too extreme. Those ladies in Florida must be drunk on the words of our founders. How dare they expect to restore the real Republic in the way our founders told us to do it in the first place? Sedicious? Would you like to borrow my dictionary?

FOOTNOTE:  DON'T FORGET TO PUT MY NAME ON THAT LIST NOW.... YOU CERTAINLY WOULDN'T WANT TO FORGET TO TRY TO PROSECUTE PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE... IN TURNER'S WORDS THE SATANIC, LUCIFERIAN, BUSH 41 CABAL LEADER!  OH, DO ME A FAVOR WOULD YA? REMIND TURNER TO PUT A BUG IN HIS BOSSES EAR FOR ME.... MY PAY CHECK IS REALLY, REALLY, REALLY LATE!​

Be blessed in righteousness.


In faith, hope, and love,
Tim Pledger

In another email to the lady Pledger stated this in regards to me....

“In light of her exposition of her thinking that is evidenced on the face of her email, why would the people of Georgia not unseat her from her position? And why would others so attuned not likewise be unseated by the people? Is such the kind of official/representative that will secure the people in truth; or is such the kind that will foist untruth and error upon the people? What should the people do for their own unity and preservation? “

Can this guy really be that stupid? After nearly a year the Chief of Security does not know that the entire Georgia Assembly except for 8 people who did not attend the meetings, voted to leave the Republic, shredded all documents, filed notice with the Courts they had denounced ANY affiliation with this scam? Wow, now this is surely evidence that Turner deserves the Compartmentalization of the Year Award!

 Fortunately the lady radio show host is not so easily intimidated. This episode was all the evidence she needed to realize she had been duped. A day or so after she received the juvenile threats she was invited to an open call hosted by one of the seditious Florida women and a gentleman in Wisconsin (hmmm he must be seditious too). I attended that call as well but hey, sedition is my middle name (oops sorry, forgot the middle name would be what, Luciferian?). It wasn't but a few moments into the call that it was apparent Turner had sent agents in to disrupt the program.  When the lady radio show host had the floor and said she preferred to remain anonymous but told her story Timothy Pledger (the thuggish threat thrower from RuSA, yeah say that five times in a row), rudely interrupted her and gave her whole name. What a gentelman huh? The lady had intended to resign publicly on her show the following Sunday but when she was assaulted once again by the idiot she announced her resignation right then and there.

After that happened Nathan Peachey tried to take me on by stating that he had tried to call me but that I had hung up on him and demanded to know why I did that and had refused to speak with him over the phone. He asked for it so I told him and the rest of the listening audience that I had no interest in speaking with someone who had spent hours with me on the phone, agreeing with me and then slashing my character hours later on a national call. I had no interest in speaking with someone who would call me for the express purpose of attempting to trap me into saying something totally untrue.. (most likely to get it on tape). You bet I hung up but now, I look at the caller ID even though the last time I wouldn't answer the phone he had somebody else dial my number from a different phone, yes you guessed it, I hung up after saying Nathan I have no interest in speaking to you good bye. Totally oblivious to the fact that he had already made a fool of himself, Nathan then brought up an article I had written and posted here and quoted something I had said about him, that he had fleeced people out of money for his own use in the name of the Republic. He said I never charged anybody for anything. I reminded him that fleeced does not mean charged (I guess he needs my dictionary too). He demanded I name the individuals in public that he had fleeced. I refused, stating that would be far from honorable without their permission but that they had been given the opportunity to submit their written statements to the investigator mentioned below. He would discover who ratted him out in due time. Not one word of defense followed that so I will give Nathan credit for not piling lies on top of slimey behavior. I for one appreciate being spared a standard Peachey Poop Parfait.

Discussion got back on track and after I had made a few statements about the current situation in this country and talked about the only possible solution Nathan interrupted again and began to launch into one of his convoluted, fantasy history lessons. At that point some of the people on the call had put up with enough, told him to shut up that if they had wanted to hear his ridiculous constitutional opinions they wouldn't have resigned from the Republic and what was he doing on the call in the first place?

Mary was gracious, far more so than I could have been, as always and smoothed the ruffled feathers getting the call back under control. Nathan zipped his lip at that point and things went forward. A woman in California spoke up and sounded extremely agitated and upset. She asked all those on the call who had left RuSA to once and for all speak up and say why in their own words. I hadn't heard a better idea in ages.

One by one people began sharing their stories. Not to be thwarted too easily the agent provoceteurs were'nt giving up so quickly and it wasn't long before Mark Lounsbury made himself known. He didn't get far as the others insisted on hearing what the people had to say. One man spoke up in utter disgust and demanded to know why this was the first time he was hearing about any of the events being described. Why indeed? Complete compartmentalizan comes to mind.

One has to ask, if RuSA is doing as well as it claims why then would Turner's simple minded thugs invade a call held by and attended by a large group of people who had declared themselves removed? Now that is a very good question.

The answer could lie in the fact that by last count the majority of elected officials and indeed some state assemblies in their entirety, in 38 states have left. Yet Turner is still claiming to have 50 states seated. Seated as what? In many states left with less than ten individuals there are people holding as many as 5 offices at once, regardless of conflicts of interest, governmental body lines or law. There is no regard to Constitutionality or to the founding documents in any way. In fact after the open call shared above an emergency session of the incredibly shrinking republic congress was called where a mere 105 people pretended to represent a quorum of all 50 states and voted on a brand spanking new law I'm told. It is now treasonous for any representative or other governmental office holder to resign and no state is allowed to leave!! Now isn't that just precious?

Less than a week after the call Mark Lounsbury sent out a letter cautioning everyone about having anything to do with those misguided Florida ladies and myself claiming that we were somehow part of some organization I had never even heard of until a couple days prior and were supporting the vision and plans of a man I have yet to hear speak. How he came to such ridiculous conclusions nobody has yet figured out.

In the midst of all this I keep seeing reference to some woman in Virginia who is supposedly stirring up trouble for poor Timmy. I think perhaps in their usual inept fashion they are actually referring to a very nice lady in West Virginia who has in no uncertain terms informed Turner she intends to bring legal action against him after he refused, and yes folks I can swear to that as I have the email he sent with his refusal, to return her signed documents after she rescinded her signature. His claim is that she signed it willingly and therefore has no legal or lawful recourse to his will. If he keeps this up Obama might mistakenly bow to him thinking him an extremist foreign potentate! Let's hope he doesn't take to wearing middle eastern attire.

In the meantime the Kool Aid Brigade continues to whine about detractors and spout dire warnings of imminent chaos if Turner's Republic fails because Oh My God it's all there is. Without Lord Timmy we are all doomed. Thank God they are merely dillusional weak minded people because if indeed Turner was Americas last chance we would be far better off burning it to the ground and starting completely over than we would be trusting any of these sheeple with our future.

The absurdity never stops with this bunch as the whole catastrophe implodes and what started out an admirable plan for the lawful restoration of our nation has morphed into a pathetic religious cult following a slick snake oil salesman sent in by the current criminal cabal running the country. The Repubic is in the grips of its death throes as lies are exposed and desperate actions overcome common sense and responsible behavior.

The latest fiasco takes place in Nathan Peachey's back yard (well it's the one he's currently claiming anyway), the free state of Pennsylvania. This story starts after Turner's public attack on Jim Wright of Pennsylvania over the past few months in which Nathan Peachey played a willing part. Naturally there was another back handed apology (not I'm sorry but I'm sorry you misunderstand, uh huh same M.O. every time.) It begins when the good folks in the Pennsylvania Assembly voted to remove Mr. Peachey from their midst. What ensued was a story many states have already seen first hand. This is a classic story of lies, deceit, power grabbing, usurpation and bully tactics but I'll let those involved tell the tale. The story will be told via a sworn Affidavit of Truth by the Pennsylvania Grand Jury Foreman, Wil Spencer.....

The good people of the allegedly re-inhabited Republic for the united states of America

J Timothy Turner, President of the allegedly re-inhabited Republic for the united states of America

Charles Wright, Vice President; all Cabinet members; members of Congress; all other Officials of said Republic

All Governors and other Officials of the free states of the allegedly re-inhabited Republic for the united states of America

All good people of the various free states and all other interested parties

YOU HAVE NOW BEEN SERVED NOTICE

Without Prejudice
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right

I am, Wil Spencer, a flesh and blood man and Sovereign Spiritual Being and do solemnly declare the following truths of my understanding, truths from which I claim my rights, rights of which it is my intent to rest in or exercise as I determine:

I am, Wil Spencer, a son of God who is at peace with all men. As a God fearing man I am subject to God, I claim the right to pray for all flesh and blood, great or small, mankind, I claim the right to live in peaceful possession of my private property at all times. I have a duty to act in the utmost kindness to all I may encounter, especially those who may appear hostile. I have a duty to serve others, for service most fully expresses my nature. I have a duty to defend those not yet aware enough to defend themselves, and to teach the willing, through humility, that which I have come to know. I have a duty to walk humbly before God and Man.

Without Prejudice
I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntary and intentionally. I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement! Including any contract or commercial agreement I may have innocently entered into through good intent by providing my signature and thumbprint to a covenant and or document of allegiance to a re-inhabited Republic for the united States of America; J Timothy Turner, its self proclaimed President; or any associated entity or person.

1) It is my understanding that along with many folks of like mind and similar intent, I enrolled myself and was inspired by the concept of the re-inhabited Republic for the unites states of America.

2) It is my understanding that this concept has been represented as an organized de jure form of interim government entity created for the purpose of returning our nation to the status of original freedom with a bottom-up structure of sovereign rule as was intended for us by our founding forefathers.

3) It is my understanding that to this end I have participated in the efforts to authentically create the de jure form of interim government known as the Pennsylvania free state.   

4) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania free state is operated by the common law form of governance called Jural Assembly.

5) It is my understanding all well intentioned and like minded sovereign flesh and blood people residing within the Pennsylvania free state boundaries are welcome to belong to the Jural Assembly, given their willingness to enter into covenant for same.

6) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania free state, along with all other free states, are self governing nation/states that exist in union as, the Republic for the united states of America.

7) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania free state has ratified a de jure constitution that provides for its structure of self governance including provision for the Grand Jury.

8) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey held office for the Jural Assembly and was instrumental in creating the operating documents and the Grand Jury By Laws of Pennsylvania free state.

9) It is my understanding that the operating documents and By-Laws are specific in outlining the procedures for holding, convening and conducting both Jural Assembly meetings and Grand Juries.

10) It is my understanding that as the Pennsylvania free state Grand Jury Foreman it falls in my accountability to call for our Jural Assembly meetings.

11) It is my understanding that as Chief Justice for the Republic, Nathan J Peachey, has no authority to call for a Jural Assembly meeting nor the authority or jurisdiction to convene a meeting or conduct business for a Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly. 

12) It is my understanding that as the Grand Jury Foreman, my call for a Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly meeting for June 19, 2011, while legitimate, was not honored, with an excuse given, regarding a lack of candidates for vacant positions of  delegates, senators, etc.

13) It is my understanding that a Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly meeting for Jun 28, 2011 was announced by Nathan J Peachey on June 21, 2011, the day after I departed the state for a 3 week commitment.

14) It is my understanding that the June 28 meeting had insufficient attendance to conduct any lawful free state business, regardless of the unlawful structure of the meeting.

15) It is my understanding that for a National Chief Justice to step into a free state and attempt to schedule and run Jural Assembly meetings is a de facto move and a gross usurpation of authority over an innocent and unwitting populace conditioned to a de facto methodology of top down rule with disregard for republic structure.

16) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey sent invitation to all Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly members to attend a Pennsylvania Jural Assembly meeting at the private residence of Galen Yoder on July 9, 2011.

17) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey was duly informed by the Pennsylvania free state Chief Justice and the Ambassador that his invitation was out of order; that he lacked authority to call such a meeting; that he has no jurisdiction to conduct such a meeting; and to do so is an unlawful usurpation of power.

18) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey responded to the Pennsylvania free state Officials by sending the following to all members of the Jural Assembly; 

This email is in response to the attack by Steve Shelly and Al Tarka on our innocent attempt for progress in Pennsylvania regarding State and Republic matters via lawful Jural Assembly.

I have a fiduciary responsibility to the people in the Republic and the State of Pennsylvania representing Constitutional interests.

Our Republic Constitution guarantees a Republican form of Government for each State. As of now we have not a Republican form of Government in Pennsylvania.

I am confused as to what to do. I am confused why Steve Shelly and Al Tarkka wrote this long email when I invited you all to convene a Jural Assembly to take care of matters. This is my responsibility.

When I try to call them and email them they do not respond to me. They do not return my phone calls. Any attempts I make to communicate or meet with them and to discuss issues, they prohibit, by refusing to communicate with me.

As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic with a fiduciary responsibility to the well-being of the Republic and the States regarding Constitutional Judiciary matters I am left with no choice but to call upon the Pennsylvania people and to convene a lawful Jural Assembly to take care of issues, as a Pennsylvanian. When I send out an invitation all of a sudden there they are, writing emails and making an attempted attack against our attempt to make progress.

I live in Pennsylvania. I desire more from our politicians then that kind of representation. Don’t you?

You are all invited to Saturdays Pennsylvania Jural Assembly. We will be conducting lawful Republic and State Jural Assembly business.

Please be there if you can. If you cannot be there, and there is anything that needs to be addressed, please fax it to 1 570 371 5188 or email to americanjusticegate@yahoo.com and we will address it.

I would like now to address Steve Shellys and Al Tarkkas email on Saturday as there is much misinformation in that email. It is not good to send out emails to people with misinformation designed to confuse people.

19) It is my understanding that on July 7, 2011 Nathan J Peachey sent a Writ of Appearance to the Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly members in reference to his unlawful July 9 meeting. By way of defending his usurpation Nathan issued the following statement;

But first let me explain then please open the attachments. We have two Governments. A general government, commonly known as the Republic which power is directly delegated by the 1787 Constitution from WE THE PEOPLE in the free States, for a general Republic Constitution. The State is not involved in this government and it is not a government for the States. It is binding directly on the people of the States. It is not binding on the States, but in the respect to each free State official, when dealing with their people, they need to be bound by oath to the Republic Constitution so they would not trespass against what the, We The People, established by the Republic Constitution. It is a government, a Republic government all by, of, and for, We the People in each of the fifty (50) States. Some people were mad in 1787 when the Founding fathers did this, and where this madness has been passed down from generational father to son, you find them mad yet to this day, about it.

Our Founding Fathers saw that our American Union would not sustain itself under the Articles of Confederation and was fast evolving into a confederation of independent sovereign nation states each operating their own little monarchy with the rights of the people usurped, using de facto style military enforcement over their people and against each other. In order to fix the problem they convened in secret, in Philadelphia and created a Constitution, to be ratified directly by We The People, instead of the state Governments as sovereigns jointly, essentially pulling the plug out from underneath the state dictatorships. Some of the founding fathers had to fear for their safety and lives for this attempt, but they accomplished it and it has brought about freedom, liberty and prosperity and the shackles of oppression and bondage were thrown off.

Each free State that has joined the Republic is not a free and independent state Republic, but we usually identify the state name as such (Pennsylvania Republic) when referring to the generally known, (national) general government ( in and of the We The People in Pennsylvania ) although its form is not wholly a national government. When referring to State business, we refer to the state as Pennsylvania Free State.

20) It is my understanding that both Nathan J Peachey and J Timothy Turner, as well as all National representatives have been asked and have promised on several occasions to produce their oaths, which they have not done.

21) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey made it clear to me personally on a personal telephone call, that no oaths from National would be forthcoming because National is not even an interim government, they technically do not exist, so they do not need to have oaths.

22) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey in dishonor and disregard for lawful structures and for having been honorably instructed regarding the unlawful usurpation involved, continued his attempt to hold a Pennsylvania Jural Assembly meeting.

23) It is my understanding that 22 people were present at Galen Yoder’s home on July 9, 2011, including Nathan J Peachey.

24) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey attempted to call a Pennsylvania Jural Assembly meeting to order.

25) It is my understanding that when specifically questioned Nathan clarified that he intended  to convene a National Jural Assembly for the Pennsylvania Republic.

26) It is my understanding that individuals stood up to protest, saying this was out of order; unlawful; that there exists no entity or group by the name he is designating; that no Pennsylvanians hold covenant with any group by the name he is calling; that there can be no lawful business or resolutions decided by convening this group; that this meeting can hold no higher status than that of a social gathering; that he has no authority or jurisdiction to hold any official meeting or conduct any official business.

27) It is my understanding that Nathan demanded folks to state their names for his recording device when they spoke at this gathering.

28) It is my understanding that folks refused to name themselves out of concern for certain de facto style operations taking place and the possibility of being contracted by doing so.

29) It is my understanding that Galen Yoder then interrupted proceedings to say his wishes were that his home should not be disrespected by such rude refusals.

30) It is my understanding that 12 of the 22 people in attendance, departed the premises rather than be convened into an unlawful Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly and rather than dishonor Galen’s personal residence.

31) It is my understanding that on July 13 Nathan J Peachey sent an email message to all members of the Pennsylvania Jural Assembly stating there was a “full Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly” held on  July 9.

32) It is my understanding Nathan’s communication misconstrued the events and people who departed, using vilifying remarks, accusations and giving ultimatums; referencing resolutions unlawfully made without disclosing them and asking for any criticism of himself be referred to the National Judiciary Committee;

This is my last email to you as part of the entire group in Pennsylvania in free state.

We have met on Saturday and we had a full Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly.

A handful of them were there obviously to not participate, but to demonstrate. But they left before we started.

Their demonstration was that they were not going to cooperate with the Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly and they left before we got started because it was asked of them to identify themselves and they felt that was making a contract.

Many people have de facto thinking. Everything they can think of when you ask of them something is….me,me,my.

The de facto contracts with us by asking us our name and then they turn around and make instruments which they sell on Wall Street and make money.

Somehow some people in the Republic are so warped in their thinking that the moment you want to know their name they think in those terms.

We do not do that. We do not go and take peoples houses away and put them in prison, or take their families away when they do not give us their names. Why are people so warped in their thinking?

All they can think of is de facto and the only defence they can think about to use is a de facto defense.

The de facto has the American people trained that way and well enough to not work together united enough, that they think that we are never able to resurrect the United States of America and the Constitution back to law. And they are almost right.

We have done a lot of things wrong, but we are always willing to make them right if they are shown to us in a way we can understand.

But when people fail to communicate with each other, then we cannot understand each other.

Here in Pennsylvania I had traveled a lot and was not home this Spring.

When I came home this early summer and wanted to find out how Pennsylvania is doing, what used to be some of my friends such as Steve Shelly which I trusted and Al Tarkka the Ambassador, I was shocked.

My friends had turned against me. All of a sudden I was the bad guy. I was the one not fit to be around or not worthy to even communicate with.

Then we find out that Will Spencer is running the country trying to get evidence to bring down the Republic.

Then we find out that there is an apparent form of secrecy among some of the people in Pennsylvania to not talk but to try to bring down the national.

Will Spencer the Grand Jury foreman labels us the crime family. I would be the first one that needs to know about any crime but yet he does not talk to me about it.

I am confused. So I decided to start to see if I can do something about it.

All I wanted to do was find out what the problem was and go from there. It appeared that some of you were under some kind of secrecy to not talk.

Yet some pass emails around and slander the Republic officials and I see many emails that people pass back and forth and they slander and write evil against each other, yet they never have met the people they write evil against.

How can you do that?

The Pennsylvania Jural Assembly has made Resolutions on July 9 2011. They will stand if the rebellion in Pennsylvania is the problem. However if I am the problem I need to know about it and the Republic needs to know about it.

We are going to give every opportunity for you to express yourself and let yourself be heard and share with the National what our problem here in Pennsylvania is, and if I am the problem, I need to know about it and they do too.

If I am your problem they need to know about it. I need to know about it. Because I am not about to continue the office of Chief Justice if I am the problem.

Steve Shelly and Al Tarkka have went and they ask people, DO YOU LIKE NATHAN?

This was an attempt to create a conspiracy so they could get rid of me, is the way I take that, but if it is not and if they have a good reason to for their actions, that then they need to be heard.

I love them and have always respected them. But if I am wrong about it and I am the problem, the Republic needs to know.

I love Jim Wright and marvel at his ability to deal with court issues and there is not a single person in the whole world that I would rather have to cover my back end in a court room then Jim Wright and his friends.

And I want to always remain friends but we cannot have a rebellious and divided house in Pennsylvania. But if I am the problem the Republic needs to know about it.

So I am going to give all of you in Pennsylvania the opportunity to have your voices heard to the Republic national about me, because if Al and Steve Shelly have a good reason to want to get rid of me as the Chief Justice, you need to know about it and so does the whole nation. That good reason they have, needs to be brought to the attention to the Judiciary Committee and House and Senate and they need to know about that reason for the sake of the nation.

We have made resolutions in Pennsylvania Jural Assembly that will be carried out, but I am going to put that on hold for ten (10) days and give all of you the opportunity to speak up and let your voices be heard first.

When the ten (10) days are over, the House will have to act on that information about me appropriately. They will submit this information to the Judiciary Committee which can then start an impeachment process to the House if they have the verifiable sufficient

evidence to do that. And they will and I will submit to that. But they need sufficient evidence. Email remarks and slander is not good enough to impeach a Justice. They need verifiable evidence. They are there to protect the Republic and they will.

Here are the following questions that you need to answer and send to the following SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.

He will gather all the information and act upon it appropriately.

Before the Restore America Plan, how well have you known Nathan Joel Peachey personally?

(This means personal, not some email blog)

Please describe his character to the best of your ability.

Has he done things to you or someone else that have not been made right you are aware of that would disqualify him as the Chief Justice?

Would you be able to provide court admissible evidence to anything about him that would disqualify him as a Chief Justice?

Since the start of the Restore America Plan and the Republic how well do you know Nathan Joel Peachey personally?

(This means personal, not some email blog)

Please describe his character as you know him personally?

What has he done that you can verify with court admissible evidence before the Judiciary Committee that you feel would disqualify as a Chief Justice?

The deadline to answer these questions is July 23 2011.

33) It is my understanding that on July 23, 2011 there was a lawful Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly meeting at which charges were presented against Nathan J Peachey in addition to his unlawful assembly action.

34) It is my understanding that the Jural Assembly found sufficient reason and evidence to convene a Grand Jury.

35) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania free state Grand Jury’s decision was to declare that Nathan J Peachey has broken his Pennsylvania free state Jural Covenant and, rather than decide “Bill” or “No Bill”, for charges to be brought to trial, the Grand Jury chose to remove Nathan’s standing as a Pennsylvanian.

36) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania free state, having dealt with its internal matters to the best of its abilities within the parameters of its own operating procedures and By-Laws, sent notice to all parties affected by Nathan J Peachey’s loss of status, so as not to be responsible for any possible harm caused by a National Chief Justice acting with no standing in any state. 

37) It is my understanding that President, J Timothy Turner responded to the Pennsylvania free state Notice by addressing his response, “TO: Will Spencer, Steve Shelley and company,” declaring it null and void, claiming Pennsylvania violated due process and remanding the National Congress to review internal state actions. He defended Nathan J Peachey without even an inquiry regarding our Jural Assembly proceedings or our Grand Jury action, saying, “This is a classic example of de-facto thinking and actions and the very thing that you falsely accuse us of doing on a regular basis. We at the National republic will stand strong together with our Congress of We the People to support the Constitution and the laws of this land and deal lawfully and firmly with those who choose to violate or disregard those laws.”

38) It is my understanding that I received a request from the National Judicial Committee Chairman for a copy of all, “ documents, sworn testimony and sworn affidavits. Any documentation used by your group to arrive at your decision will need to be sent. If you have a recording of the hearing, I would like a copy of that. It is my understanding that Grand Jury procedures are completely confidential.

39) It is my understanding that the Judicial Committee was responded to with Pennsylvania free state’s declaration of its independent authority over its internal affairs and it declined to comply with National’s demand for confidential information.

40) It is my understanding, “the power comes from the people and not from government. Government is only a mere servant of the people and must do their bidding or be changed. That is what establishing the Republic is all about, changing a repressive government to one where the people are free to make their own choices and their own mistakes. The only way for the people to grow and become strong and self-sufficient is to let them make their choices and if they find they have made a mistake, let them learn from that and correct it. No-one said this would be easy. But to choose one’s own path in life and then follow it no matter what obstacles are thrown in our way, That is true freedom.”

41) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey chose to respond to the Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly Grand Jury Notice with a personal message to Steve Shelly and myself saying, “Wil and Steve, I heard that I have been removed from Pennsylvania free state and also now not the lawful Republic Chief Justice according to your findings. How should I interact with the Republic now? I am at a loss to describe the disappointment. I am requesting you grant me opportunity to face my accuser and to make peace and make right what I did wrong so that we could continue together in peace and friendship. Is that not beneficial for all of us? Again I am sorry for any wrongs committed and I do apologize. Can you both forgive me?How do you expect me to proceed from here?                                                                     Your humble Servant Nathan Joel Peachey” Would not a Chief Justice understand the frivolity of attempting to appease a Grand Jury by supplication to individual members?

42) It is my understanding the National Judicial Committee Chairman sent notice that the Committee agreed to hear our dispute and would be considering the Constitutionality of our decision and again requested confidential information.

43) It is my understanding that Pennsylvania free state denied any dispute and reconfirmed its Grand Jury action and Notice, declaring the Constitutionality of its own internal actions.

44) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey re-sent the National Judicial Committee Chairman’s notice with many petty and unprofessional comments inserted as follows;(Nathan’s comments in blue)

 This dispute concerns many different facets. This is to inform you that the Committee has agreed to investigate this dispute. While I do not believe that the Judiciary Committee has any authority to become involved with an action taken by a free state Grand Jury, there are a few of the things we will look at. One is The Judiciary and Judicial proceedings, civil and criminal in which I believe the procedures of the Grand Jury fall. Let me be clear, while it is not under the authority of the Committee to determine or try and influence the findings of a Grand Jury, we would like to open a dialog with not just Penn. but any and all free states to firm up how a Grand Jury is called, what may be presented or what can’t, if any. Under common law there must be an injured party and with a Grand Jury, they are to determine if there is sufficient evidence to issue a True Bill or a No Bill. The Grand Juries act only as a finder of fact to support the claim brought before it. As far as I know, there is no requirement to allow the accused to appear before a Grand Jury.

That’s right. The accused does not have to appear before a Grand Jury. It can be a one-sided hearing, but all it establishes is whether the case should go for trial or not.

Because a Grand Jury can be a one-sided hearing, no determination regarding anything affecting the accused can be lawfully made, such as removal from the State or Republic or any other thing for that matter.

   

DEATH THROES PART 2

    The Grand Jury only determines if there is enough evidence to take it to the next level, a trial. There the accused will have the right to face their accuser.

    I do not believe that the Grand Jury has the authority to issue orders or sentence anyone, that is reserved for the petit jury. Without a trial, we deny the accused the right to due process.

That’s right..

This is the same with a Jural Assembly, whose actions are similar to the actions of a Grand Jury. I intend to ask for input from the states in order to draw up a common law procedure for the Courts and the Grand Juries. This will not be a binding document, but a suggestion for the free states to use so that we can have a fairly uniform procedure throughout the nation. While every state does not have to match their neighbor exactly, the people should be able to travel freely throughout the states and not get hooked into some kind of problem because one state is operating out in left field.

This is not the same as a Jural Assembly. A Jural Assembly is not even anywhere close to a Grand Jury. It’s function is entirely the opposite, than that of a Grand Jury.

The word “Grand” means criminal, because it is a jury to determine criminality of an issue, while a Jural Assembly is a group of all the Jurists, people that are of a certain body politic in law, that get together to resolve issues concerning their body politic, issues that need to be resolved and taken care of, regarding their body politic. A Republic or State Jural Assembly does not have the authority or lawful right to deal with criminal issues. That is reserved for the Grand Jury and subsequently the Courts.

Read your Constitution.

A Republic Jural Assembly is nothing more then an Amendment VII common law court. A common law court cannot try and hear criminal cases. They can only decide and hear issues that are not of criminal nature but still have to be decided on and settled by the people. While a common law court has only a certain fixed number of names drawn by the presiding Justice, or a Justice of the Peace, such as 9-12, to settle the issue, the Justice convening a Republic Jural Assembly, needs to invite a quorum or all the jurists in any given locality that will be affected by the Resolutions made.

Only a Justice or a Justice of the Peace is authorized and qualified to convene and hold both a State and a Republic Jural Assembly, because it is just a common law court. The only difference is a common law court convenes with a fixed amount of jurists such as 9-12, while the Jural Assembly is the full body of Jurists in any given area notified to attend. That’s the only difference. I am the Chief Justice on the One Supreme Court. I have the duty and lawful responsibility to hold Court anytime and anywhere there is a need, sitting on any circuit or district court I am found to be at. Pennsylvania is a district in the Republic. The Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly is a Republic district common law court. Anything decided in it cannot again be re-examined in any United States (Republic) court then according to the rules of the common law. The rules of the common law court I held was very simple…. I invited all the people and laid out the issues and I let them decide. I DO NOT understand what the issue of question is here, or why it is difficult to understand. In Pennsylvania I was the only one with the proper authority, qualified to convene a Republic Jural Assembly for the Pennsylvanians.Why is it being questioned?

A Republic Jural Assembly is an Assembly of the Jurists in the Republic, bound by and constitutors of the United States Constitution by ratification. They resolve issues having to do with matters in jurisdiction of the Republic in their State.

Some of these would be judicial review of erring Republic district judges and publicly censuring them and sending this to the Judicial Committee. If the Judicial Committee does not act appropriately upon it, then they need to send it to the House for impeachment vote. They cannot remove or impeach a judge, as that is reserved for a Constitutional procedure process.

Reviewing and removing Republic Grand Jury Foreman and their juries if they are found wanting and refuse to be corrected. The Republic Jural Assembly is the watchdog for the Grand Juries because the Republic members are We, the People and anyone engaged in any governmental service capacity as the Grand Jury, answers to the people. The Grand Jury is considered the fourth branch of government but private, and not all of them are regulated by the Courts and are subject to We, the People.

The Republic Jural Assembly can call a Grand Jury to action if necessary.

The Republic Jural Assembly cannot dissolve a standing State or Republic Court Grand Jury as those function for, and are subject to the Court.

The Republic Jural Assembly is the highest level of authority, for issues that are not delegated by Constitution.

The Republic Jural Assembly can make decisions that affect all the rest of the people if the people had opportunity to attend and were notified of the subject-matter.

A free State Jural Assembly is an assembly of State Constitution Jurists bound by ratification to their State Constitution and they decide issues having to do with their State Constitution jurisdiction.

Both Republic and State Jural Assemblies, the prerequisite for standing and being lawful, is if all the members or a quorum of them, have been notified or invited to the Assembly.

If a Republic Jural Assembly would want to decide issues that would only affect Republic issues in that county, then all the jurists in that county are invited to attend.

If a Republic Jural Assembly would want to decide issues that would affect the entire state, then all the jurists in that state are invited to attend.

The same way with a State Jural Assembly.

 In Pennsylvania all the Republic jurists were invited.

They were all notified of the subject-matter at hand to be discussed upon, and that decisions would likely be made.

Proxy letters were included in the invitation for any members wanting to give input on the subject-matter but would be unable to attend.

The Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly was lawfully convened as a common law court by a presiding Republic Justice living in the State.

Only Resolutions were made regarding Republic issues.

The Grand Jury foreman was dismissed and his Grand Jury to not have any lawful standing regarding having anything to do with Republic business due to

incompetence and untruthfulness and engaging in libel and slander against the Republic officials.

The Republic Jural Assembly did not dismiss him from serving for the State, but only that regarding any Republic business he is not recognized due to suspected sedition against the Republic.

The Republic district Justice was publicly censured for not fulfilling the role as a Republic Justice but rather engaging in sedition.

The people that refused to co-operate with the We, the Peoples common law court….. Republic Jural Assembly were disciplined by the Republic Jural Assembly. They were removed to the status of not have any standing in the Republic till they acknowledge

the Resolutions and acknowledge to abide by them, then they too will be accepted again.

    The actions of the Jural Assembly will also be looked into to determine its Constitutionality. I am asking the Committee members to review the procedures and action of the Jural Assembly. We want to discover who has the right to call a jural assembly, what is its Constitutional authority, how many people does it take to have a quorum, does the jural assembly have the authority to make rulings and enforce them without holding a trial? Wouldn’t that also be a denial of due process? Does it take a majority of the people in a free state to pass a resolution or are we going to let a few decide for the many?

A Republic Jural Assembly is just a Amendment VII common law court with all the people invited that are affected by the settlement of a decision as opposed to a small handful of people solving a non-criminal case. A Republic Jural Assembly does not have to do “due process of law”. That’s reserved for issues that have to be tried in the Courts. A Republic Jural Assembly is the people speaking, and We, the People decide the issues. Naturally they would want to be fair and allow the problem people to testify and be properly heard before Resolutions are made. In a Republic form of Government, a few people decide issues for the masses, such as your Judicial Committee does. A small hand full of men decide issues that will affect many people. A Republic Jural Assembly is not that way. Everyone is invited to attend, subject matter exposed and those that show up, then get to make the Resolutions.

    These are a few of the questions that have come up during our initial look at this dispute. I am asking each party to submit their thoughts and supporting documents. While we have received information from one side, we have not received anything from the other. The other side is rebellious. There is only a small hand-full of people with the rebellion. The core is 4 people. Jim Wright. Mike Radogna, Steve Shelly and Will Spencer along with a few of their friends. All the rest want to join the Republic and do the right thing. Pennsylvania has about 78 people signed up and there is only about 26 that are active. The others are not much interested, don’t care or cannot afford to travel or to participate, but they have been notified just the same, prior to the Republic Jural Assembly and will be notified of these Resolutions and will be asked to acknowledge them.

    We are not asking for anything discussed in the Grand Jury, but we would like to receive a copy of the complaint and copies of any evidence that would be forwarded to a court for a trial so that we might be able to make intelligent decisions. The information we receive will not be shared with the other party or with anyone outside of the Committee. We will issue a finding of facts at the close of the investigation to the House with any recommendations we might have reached. Our recommendations to the House are not binding on the states. It will be up to the whole house to decide if there is enough of a concern to address the issue with a Bill and try and pass a law. I cannot share my personal opinion as I and the Committee must set aside our opinion and/or bias and decide the matters before them according to the law and the Constitution.

I assume you are making a request to the Grand Jury. It would be nice if they would co-operate with your requests. I highly doubt they will. That’s the way they have been treating me since April. They have completely ignored me and

I am of 0 significance to them. Its their way of sticking their nose up at the Republic and telling us they have a different plan. According to information I have and have send to you, their plan is to prove that we are a fraud. If they would co-operate with you then we would not have this problem. They would never have had a Grand Jury to start with, because the only issue here in Pennsylvania is their no-response to the Republic. The Grand Jury hearing was every intention to be just what they are making it to be. Its not a mistake. They have planned this and they probably have planned this for all you guys too. I am only number one out of the many to come, that they probably will treat this way. Good luck.

Part of the vendetta they have against me was that in their minds they believe I was responsible for the Press Release that Tim Pledger wrote about Jim Wright. I tried to explain to them that I had nothing to do with that letter but they aren’t buying that.

So please make sure that this Press Release is taken down and my apology letter gets put back up. That’s why I wrote it.

Nathan

45) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey was chastised by the Committee Chairman for his action, stating, “

I find your statement that a Republic Jural Assembly does not have to follow the law and give anyone affected their right to due process, very disturbing. I believe that goes directly against the Constitution and the Republican form of government. Please enlighten the Committee and me as to how you come to that conclusion. While, We, the People may be speaking, not all of we the people have had their right to speak. I can understand if you sent out letters to all the people explaining the planned referendums and asking them for their input and vote at some time in the future, but to send out proxy’s and ask for an immediate decision makes no sense to me. The referendums would have to be placed before the people and allow them to research them and have time for debate before they are voted on. This problem of putting forth an issue and demanding a response immediately is unrealistic. The people do not have time to work things out in their mind, to weigh the pros and cons. We cannot ask the people to make snap decisions and then find out later that that decision was not in the best interest of the people. Then it is 10 times harder to reverse that decision and correct it. Give the people time to decide what they feel is right. In our Assembly we put forth an idea for discussion and if it is worthy, someone will make a motion to for a committee to discuss the pros and cons and then return to the assembly with their findings. The assembly as a whole has the right to comment and a discussion follows. Then a vote is scheduled for another assembly. After each assembly a copy of the minutes are sent to all members of the assembly and everyone is kept up to date on the ongoing discussions and we welcome personal input or email input which is shared with the whole assembly. So everyone is involved with the decisions made by the assembly. “

46) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania Attorney General shared his feelings stating, “I am not looking to tear down what has been created on either the State or National level but the fact remains this is a bottom up construction of government that is working in reverse. Nathan Peachey stepped into our system (Pennsylvania Free State) and started making directives. This has created a split in our state structure.  Nathan Peachey has sucessfully placed a wedge in our Pennsylvania Free State structure causing some members to remove themselves as jurists or it so appears. Until National comes to understand they are to follow our total Free State directives (all 50 Free States) we are simply spinning our wheels. I am aware of similiar issues as these that have been imposed upon other Free States.

At this time we have a second Grand Jury in our Free State and there may already be a third started due the non-sense of Nathan Peachey. This National Committee that has been created to oversee us as Free States is insane. My suggestion might be to address each State individually to create its own committee to oversee the National on a unified basis. National must answer to us as a complete unit of 50 Free States.

As long as National can say "I'm the Boss" and get away with it we will never have what we are attempting to accomplish. Maybe a contract between all Free States is needed to impose restrictions or rules upon the National by a vote of each Grand Jury (or Committee) for resolution of matters such as these. Any objection from National or anyone else on this issue will clearly be noted and should be considered by each Free State.”

47) It is my understanding that I was removed without notice or reason from the National Grand Jury weekly calls. Upon inquiry, I was informed by Randy Miller, National Grand Jury Foreman, on August 14, 2011, “Wil, when information comes forth that a foreman has been removed from his/her position they are removed from this forum and the conference calls. Whatever you do in your free state to remedy this situation is entirely up to you.”

48) It is my understanding that several members of other states have attempted on the behalf of Nathan J Peachey, J Timothy Turner, or the National Judicial Committee, to either advise or question me personally regarding the actions of our collective Jural Assembly. These are people that ought to know the difference between a state action and a personal issue, including, but not limited to Donna Kozak, Nebraska; Fred Moore South Carolina; Rick Winer, RRB; Ron Beal North Carolina; Chris Salonia, unidentified.

49) It is my understanding that on August 16, 2011 Nathan J Peachey sent an email to all members of the Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly, informing them of a telephone jural assembly to be held that very same day.

50) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey made announcement that he was unsure of his actions at his previous meeting of July 9, that he would be bringing changes, that resolutions were now void and its best to not remove people.

51) It is my understanding that this email notice was accompanied with a document called “Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly Nullification August 16 2011”.

52) It is my understanding this document gave false information and a lot of unclear communication, justification for gross error and a full rescinding of all resolutions of July 9, 2011, as follows;

 On or about June 21 2011 I emailed an invitation to my fellow Pennsylvanians to join

together in a Pennsylvania Jural Assembly on June 28th 2011 for the purpose of

discussing issues regarding Pennsylvania and the vacant offices and to discover and learn

how we might bring resolution. Due to distance and time constraints for an evening

meeting many were unable to make the meeting.

On July 5 2011 I issued a Writ of Appearance to the Pennsylvanians to appear to a

Republic Jural Assembly on July 9 2011 as the Chief Justice of the Republic, so we could

discuss and resolve certain issues concerning Pennsylvania and the Republic that were

not being addressed and resolved otherwise.

Approximately 22 people gathered to convene the meeting. Approximately 5

Pennsylvanians actively engaged in the opposition of me convoking a Republic Jural

Assembly, initiated by a Writ of Appearance and signed as the Chief Justice of the

Republic/acting as the moderator or Justice of the Peace. They provided no Constitutional

evidence that I was acting unlawfully, only conclusionary statements and they departed.

Fifteen members of the Republic Jural Assembly convened and certain issues were

discussed and Resolutions were made passing unanimously. The Republic Jural

Assembly adjourned.

I agreed to the Republic Jural Assembly to notify all the Pennsylvanians at once

regarding the Resolutions and to request acknowledgment within fifteen (15) days by all

those wishing to remain with the Republic.

Upon the expiration of ten (10) days no evidence or documentation was provided to, or

received from Nathan Peachey about any deficiency on his part from the Judiciary

Committee or the House.

However upon further personnel investigating into this matter I can see where the Writ of

Appearance, being signed as the Chief Justice of the Republic and using its Seal, could

have been construed by some to not be Constitutional although I had not meant it that

way and I have not intentionally and knowingly attempted to commit anything

unconstitutionally. It was only due to the fact that I was not able to communicate properly

with Steve Shelly regarding issues I felt I needed to be able to share with the Republic

Jural Assembly somehow or someway. But the way the Writ of Appearance posed certain

questions regarding the Pennsylvania free state Government, I see how it could have

easily been taken the wrong way, or perceived to be a power take over when I had not

intended it by any means to be that way. I simply felt I had things that needed to be

brought to the attention of the Pennsylvanians and Steve Shelly refused to help me with

that by refusing to communicate with me.

I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to those that it caused offence for me

convening a Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly using the office as Chief Justice for

the Republic to resolve issues even though I was only taking the implied position of

acting Justice of the Peace or Assembly moderator. I understand how it could have been

construed to have been inappropriate and not constitutional. On the other hand we often

have very little reference points we can use in a lot of things as we are building this

Republic and it does take a lot of tolerance and grace with each other. Conclusionary

statements that something is, or is not constitutional, are always subject to different

viewpoints. I am asking all of you to extent your Grace to me and together we can finish

the job that we have set out to do in reinstating the Constitutional Republic.

For the sake of Peace and Unity with all those Pennsylvanians that came to join the

Assembly session but felt they could not stay because they felt it was unconstitutional, I

apologize to you and I hereby abrogate and rescind the Writ of Appearance and the

Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly and my involvement of it as moderator or of

taking the position of acting Justice of the Peace as a Chief Justice.

Here are the Resolutions that were passed and how they have changed due to expiration

of need or change of viewpoint and abrogation of involvement and rescinding.

RESOLUTIONS

Resolved:

Republic Justice Steve Shelly for district Pennsylvania is censured for bad behavior

contrary to the oath of his office for a Republic district Justice.

This Resolution is not valid anymore as Nathan Peachey has had a personal visit on July

22, 2011, with Steve Shelly where positive affirmations were given by Steve Shelly to

Nathan Peachey to resolve the issue of his position of being two (2) different justices, the

Pennsylvania free state and a Republic district Judge.

Nathan also apologized and asked forgiveness from Steve Shelly on July 22 2011 for the

offence of a personal threat to the safety of him, through delivering direct, specific

scripture passages via electronic media.

Resolved:

Make a motion to Jim Fitzgerald Republic national Chief Ambassador to permanently

remove Republic Ambassador Al Tarkka as Ambassador for Pennsylvania.

This Resolution is not valid anymore as Al Tarkka has resigned as an Ambassador and

Nathan Peachey has apologized to Al and Judy Tarkka on or about July 21 2011 for

anything that he said or felt about them that were untrue and incorrect.

Resolved:

Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly has removed Will Spencer as Republic Grand

Jury Foreman and dissolution his Grand Jury for Pennsylvania Republic.

This Resolution is null and void as the Republic Jural Assembly Resolutions do not

stand.

Resolved:

Pennsylvania Jural Assembly removed from the Republic all of those who walked out of

the Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly, due to conspiring with those exhibiting bad

behavior rather then building the Republic.

This Resolution is null and void as the Republic Jural Assembly Resolutions do not

stand. This form of discipline has always raised more questions then it has resolved, in

other states as well. For us it should lay the question to rest since this Resolution is now

null and void.

Resolved:

A motion was resolved that all those people in Pennsylvania who have joined the

Republic shall be notified of these Pennsylvania Republic Jural Resolutions and shall

have opportunity of fifteen (15) days to respond and request to remain as a member of the

Republic and acknowledge agreement to these Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly

Resolutions, or they will be removed from the Republic for lack of the Pennsylvanians

not knowing who they are and if they have good and helpful intentions or not.

This Resolution is null and void as the Republic Jural Assembly Resolutions do not

stand.

For those of you that supported the Republic Jural Assembly Resolutions, as many of you

did, it is up to all of us to join together and support the Republic and let our voices be

heard to bring about the change we desire to see.

I have many duties to attend to with the Republic One Supreme Court and do not have

the time to be hindered by distractions of petty strife. I trust you. I will always go the 2nd

mile in the face of adversity like Jesus Christ commanded; rather then waste valuable

energy by the exercise of strife and contention. I wish you Pennsylvanians all the best and

it was a pleasure helping you to reinstate our Republic. If at any time you desire help or

the way is open for me to attend your meetings as a Pennsylvanian, I will do so. Again I

am sorry where I have disappointed you and I hope that all can be well here in

Pennsylvania. There is a lot of work that needs to be done here in Pennsylvania and I am

willing to help and assist in whatever way I can.

In His Name; Jesus Christ

52) It is my understanding that although Nathan J Peachey submitted his apology and has recinded his sanctimonious resolutions, I was still not reinstated on the Grand Jury Foreman calls and Skype venue.

52) It is my understanding that on August 18, 2011 notice was sent to all Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly members that a second jural assembly would be meeting at a second location on the same day as the already scheduled Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly meeting on August 21. This meeting to be held at Simion Stoltzfus’s home.

53) It is my understanding the announcement for the new and inauthentic assembly meeting had an attachment as follows;

 Pennsylvania Assembly

August 21, 2011 1:00 pm

Open Invitation to all Pennsylvanians in Pennsylvania free state

My name is Simeon Stoltzfus

There are two (2) groups in Pennsylvania free state. It is very easy to notice. We are now all faced with having to make an honest decision of which group we want to support and work with. Its time for all of us to get off the fence and put our whole united effort into supporting and building that group we each choose to be with and lay aside our childish offences. Most people in Pennsylvania free state already have done that, from deep within their own selves, they have already decided inwardly which side they

support by their own actions, their interpretation of law, how they carry out their duties in the Republic, who they communicate with, what they do with the emails and how they uphold the Republic and state Constitutions etc. You are welcome and free to make the calling of your choice and identify with either group of your choice and then stay there and be loyal with them. The one group in Pennsylvania free State belonging with Will Spencer, Steve Shelly and associates, having recently submitted allegations and charges under oath, on the public domain that can now be used as undeniable court-admissible evidence for the record without reservation, against them, that they are not for a Constitutional Republic and that they are taking multiple roles such as being both the

Victim, the Accused and the Accuser, and exercising the duties by impersonation of a Prosecutor, the Grand Jury, the Jury, the Judge, the House and the impeachment Senate, completely disregarding our Republic Constitutional three (3) branch form of Government with all its checks and balances that they have taken an oath to uphold. This is unlawful, evidence of sedition on the public domain, trespass against We, the People, and against our Republic Constitution, the supreme law of the land. We will not

tolerate this. We are just coming out of a de facto system and we will not go back into one again. The other Pennsylvania free State assembly of Pennsylvanians, convened on July 9th, 2011 at Galen Yoder’s, in Republic Jural Assembly to discuss issues. They did pass Resolutions but since some of them have expired on validity before they were released, while some things and viewpoints have changed, so all of them have been nullified and struck from the Record. All Resolutions are void and dismissed from that Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly. As for me and my House, I can and will no longer support, tolerate or identify with the above mentioned group and have chosen to dissociate myself with any of their actions, do not uphold any of their

accusations, findings, claims and beliefs although they are welcome to join this Republic Jural Assembly if they desire to uphold that which we will support and uphold, but I believe their slanderous accusations and charges they have provided for the public domain, against Republic Officials, is court-admissible solid evidence that has spoken of another direction they want to go; one that has caused a separation between us and the original intention of reinstating the Republic in Peace, Friendship and Unity. I welcome everyone that holds and supports what we support, on my property and those who are

committed to those people, in that Pennsylvania free state in union with the Republic for the united States of America and President James Timothy Turner Administration to join this Pennsylvania free State Republic Jural Assembly, this Sunday afternoon.

You are welcome to join us in Unity, Friendship and Peace on August 21, 2011 at 1:00 pm on my private property. We fully support the de jure interim President James Timothy Turner Republic for the united States of America and his administration. We uphold the Holy Bible, Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776, Republic Constitution 1787 and the 1791 Bill of Rights as the supreme law of the land for our governing documents.

Common Law Rules of Attendance pursuant to the Constitution Bill of Right ARTICLE (1)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

1. All Assembly members agree to be subject to these rules of attendance under the common law.

2. No one that has engaged in, or wishes to promote sedition, division, dissention and slanderous accusations and who support those, who have committed common law, or judicial unlawful actions against We, the Peoples Constitution, or against any Republic or State official without publicly repenting to the Assembly, can come on my property.

3. No one that wants to be with and work subversively on both sides of the fence by phone or email or any other means with any group, or other subversion tactics, other then the Pennsylvania free State Republic that we are supporting, can come on my property.

4. Only those that want to build the Republic and support President James Timothy Turner and his Administration of the Republic for the united States of America can come on my property this Sunday afternoon, in Peace, Friendship and Unity.

5. I reserve and maintain exclusivity of all my common law rights to call on and remove any offenders from off my property, anyway that is necessary.

August 21, 2011; 1:00 pm

1. Meet and greet and sign Pennsylvania free State Republic Jural Assembly covenant forms,

2. Moderator Simeon Stoltzfus, Assembly called to order,

3. Chet Ricewick, Scripture reading and a word of prayer and moderating the Confession session,

4. Open free-will confessions for anyone that feels they have broken any of the above rules, or rules of peace at any time and desire to be cleared with the Assembly in peace,

5. Opportunity for anyone in Pennsylvania free State to call any Assembly member to the floor on any issue of wrong-doing they have against anyone and extent grace to make things right,

6. Galen Yoder, moving forward in Peace, Friendship and Unity and how the Word of God is essential in the success of this Republic,

7. Opportunity for any Pennsylvania Senators, Representatives or any State Officers to share,

8. Republic Chief Justice Nathan Peachey, on the Republic Constitution and what it means to coexist in a quasi-relationship with the State Constitution. Opportunity will be given to have all Assembly members ratify by their own signatures, the 1787 Constitution, (if they have not done so yet) and become a permanent member of that Pennsylvania free State that supports and is in union with the Republic for the united States of America,

9. Assembly review of candidate Galen Yoder, for the Pennsylvania free State Governor, or any other candidate brought forth; absent any Constitutional objections, the Assembly votes for Governor and charges it with executive duties and responsibilities for Pennsylvania free State,

10. Governor addresses the Assembly and whatever he desires to bring to the Assembly,

11. Assembly reviews the proposed version of the Pennsylvania free State Budget to be submitted to

the Republic,

12. Any other business that anyone is so inclined to bring to the Assembly,

Closing with Prayer and bring your own food for evening break

Galen Yoder Simeon Stoltzf

54) It is my understanding that many good intentioned people are being misled by manipulation and misunderstanding being without knowledge of the personal due diligence required in order to truly experience sovereign freedom.

55) It is my understanding that Nathan J Peachey released a personal apology on August 20, 2011 to myself and Steve Shelly concerning his jural assembly actions and informed us the resolutions had been struck from the records.

56) It is my understanding that many Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly members are confused and upset regarding this continuing manipulative usurpation of power aimed at inhibiting the progress of our free state’s preparation for possible future events, learning best practices for remedy for financial and legal problems caused by fraudulent de facto practices, growing our numbers within our state, connecting with other states for unity and sharing and mutual support, etc. From a concerned member;   To all free Pennsylvanians,

   It's been quite a roller Coaster ride For us, the ride stops here. We've been Christians for more than three decades. We also know the difference between good and evil. So it is not our place to judge anything for another; and everyone must take the responsibility to draw their own conclusions.

    We have tried to live our lives with an emphasis on giving a hand up to those in need, doing what needs to be done and putting others needs before our own. And when we joined the republic, we thought that this is what It stood for. We have met wonderful people who share the same aspiration and goals. So Why are we being divided? We cannot see why it has become necessary to divide Pennsylvania into two groups. Yet, one or two are telling us there are two groups. The Original and a New Group. The only difference we can see between the two is that the Original demands accountability and truth and the new group does blindly what they are told. This makes us wonder. Who is telling them what to do and why? Any problems from any situation should have been brought before the Original Grand Jury through the proper channels. This was not done. Instead, people were approached individually which gave us the Nathan Peachy problem. Once again the simple has become complicated. It is our belief that God has called us all too unite for the purpose of being free and enjoying all of His abundant blessings. It is just that simple. Either we are free or we are not. We are tired of being afraid of whom we are to associate with, unnecessary secret  discussions and meetings in isolation, A recent conference call where proper notice was not given, in our case, less than one hour by email. Yes...this made us upset.. because this left us out of the loop and made us look incompetent. Where does this type of nonsense come from? We cannot find peace, unity or freedom in meeting on private property with stipulations, ultimatums and threat of removal "by any way that is necessary."

    We ask this....Why meet in this manner? Where is the freedom in this? We ask where has this fear come from? 1 John 4:18 .Again we ask where has this fear come from? We believe it is safe to say that this fear is not of good, but, of evil. And if there is anything that is de facto......this is it. Eph. 6:12-20. We all should conduct ourselves accordingly.

   Please do not take us the wrong way. We refuse to disrespect anyone..This is how we feel. And we also need grace. In the Original group in before last meetings, in our haste to get things done, prayer has been over-looked, so we are not perfect. We like our Jury Foreman, Will Spencer, because he is a truth seeker and the truth is what will ultimately set us all free. And there is no dishonor in that. We realize that under the current de facto system that nobody is truly free. But, it is our God given right to think freely and no one has the right to take it from us. We believe that many of us have gone the 3rd, 4th and 5th mile for this cause. And, we have just about every diverse background in Pennsylvania. represented in our group. If we can't come together in small numbers, how on earth can we come together in larger numbers? We all think differently, and that's okay. However, our freedom is at stake if we head this new direction. We do not believe the Original grand jury is causing the division. So, who is dividing us? The last minute second meeting only causes further division.. These are not

honorable tactics. We the people will not be silenced in this manner.

We have decided that we will not travel hundreds of miles for a cause which is dividing us all. But we will travel to represent freedom for Pennsylvania and it's freedom seeking people. So, we will be attending the Original group meeting until all the truth comes has come out.

                                    God bless everyone in Pennsylvania.

                                    JameyKarl /Sally/ Karl, Jr. Behringer

57) It is my understanding that the Pennsylvania free state shares this problematic experience of top down National bullying, Judicial usurpation, unauthorized interference, unlawful demands and lack of accountability as befits the leadership of a free nation. We have validation of multiple state governments created and violations of all sorts from at least 36 states, including Oregon, New York, Utah, Illinois, Nexada, Indiana, Arizona, California, Georgia, Louisiana, Florida, North Carolina, Arkansas, West Virginia, Wisconsin, North Dakota, and Michigan.

58)  Therefore be it now known to any and all interested, concerned or affected parties, that I, Wil Spencer, state clearly, specifically, and unequivocally, my intent to peacefully and without malice, share my statements and experiences here, with sincere intent for the betterment of the knowledge of my fellow man, in honor and truth, to assist them to avoid risk of becoming ensnared in de facto entrapment or in any way receiving dishonor at the hands of deceit from clever men.

Wil Spencer

For all those people in dozens of states who have been through the same story themselves this will seem familiar in the extreme and each time an individual state was invaded and taken over by national thugs, Nathan Peachey was not only aware but deeply involved. He has no understanding whatsoever of the intent of our founding fathers, our founding documents or factual history. The very idea that our Constitution was written in secrecy is ridiculous to start with. How, if that were the case did the woman on the street in Philadelphia know to approach Benjamin Franklin as he came out of the building and ask of him, “what have you given us sir?” to which he answered, “A   Republic madam, if you can keep it.” Even in 1787 it would have been impossible for 56 men to reamin locked up in a building in secrecy for four months in order to write secret documents.

Nathan Peachey argued with me for over an hour on the phone when I insisted the 1787 Constitution did not and could not have included the Bill of Rights as that set of Articles was not even written and was not ratified until December of 1791. His answer was, “can you prove it?” This is a standard de facto tactic, to make statements and challenge those who object to obvious error prove the truth. Of course at the time I was holding those documents in my hand, in black and white and written in perfect English of the time. On two separate occasions I urged Nathan to read Original Intent by David Barton to gain a better understanding of our founders intentions but he continues to deliberately twist our history and the words of our founders to suit the top down agenda of his bosses. He continues to enlist the help of other states to “go on down and straigten out other states” as he has done twice just recently in Indiana. This has resulted in literally dozens of people pretending to represent the people of their states with no understanding of the true structure of our de jure Republic let alone the original intent of our founders as their only reference is Nathan Peacheys convoluted and deliberately misleading instruction on the same. Perhaps this is the reason CW Wright  kept insisting to me that he is the president of the WHOLE CONGRESS! Not even the so called Vice President of this fantasy understands our structure.

This has not been set up as a second and even more controlling de facto by accident!

For those who have been kept in the dark, take heed for if you suddenly demand answers you will become targets yourselves. On the other hand why do you want to continue association with this farce?

This is how real patriots view this joke...  http://www.islandmakers.us/turner/

There is much I cannot share yet as I said above but it is long past time for the public to be warned viraly about this de facto trap.

Remember, no real Constitutional Republic would or could have anything to do with the Hague, the enforcement arm of the United Nations, a Communist organization run by the CFR and Trillateral Commission. These are the very people responsible for the police state we are currently living in. They have brought us Agenda 21, the International Property Maintenance Code, Restricted Travel, Open borders resulting in millions of illegals draining our economy and perpetrating violence on us, Loss of Liberty, Re-distribution of Wealth, Depopulation plans via biological genocide..... so Turner claims to have filed papers with the Hague why? The Republic needs to be recognized by the enemy why? American people can't be free without U.N. Sanction?

THIS ORGANIZATION IS INDEED SUFFERING ITS DEATH THROES SO DON'T GO DOWN WITH IT. AMERICA NEEDS STOUT HEARTS, INTELLIGENT MINDS AND TRUE PATRIOTS NOT BLIND FOLLOWERS.

YOU ARE THE ANSWER!

TLGA